Epstein Secrets

occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Ajtomay By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafana 2This is contingent, however, o

ument 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-CV-21586-ASO PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO

y Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and express consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

DRAFT ONLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:10-CV-21586 PODHURST ORSECK v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into the Registr

$526,000 he has already paid the Plaintiffs. * Additionally, in an authoritative communication by the then First Assistant United States Attorney, Jeffrey Sloman, to Epstein's counsel Kenneth Starr dated December 4, 2007, pg 2, fn the Government agreed that it was the intentions of the parties that the "wai

DRAFT ONLY PODHURST ORSECK PA V JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into the Regis

r. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00729137 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington D.C., a review process tha

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 10-CV-21586-ASG PODHURST ORSECK, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Depo

dressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

DRAFT ONLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:10-CV-21586 PODHURST ORSECK v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into the Registr

y Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and express consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

DRAFT ONLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:10-CV-21586 PODHURST ORSECK v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into the Registr

dressed by Plaintiff, Mr. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington M., a review process that

DRAFT ONLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.:10-CV-21586 PODHURST ORSECK v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into the Registr

$526,000 he has already paid the Plaintiffs. * Additionally, in an authoritative communication by the then First Assistant United States Attorney, Jeffrey Sloman, to Epstein's counsel Kenneth Starr dated December 4, 2007, pg 2, fn the Government agreed that it was the intentions of the parties that the "wai

DRAFT ONLY PODHURST ORSECK PA V JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Deposit Funds into the Regis

occur no later than December 14, 2007. There must be closure in this matter. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Ajtomay By: Jeffrey . Sloman First Assistant United States Attorney Enclosure cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Marie Villafana 2This is contingent, however, o

ument 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-CV-21586-ASO PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S AMENDED NOTICE AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DEPOSIT FUNDS INTO

r. Epstein, through counsel, with the knowledge and consent of the United States Attorney Mr. Acosta and First Assistant Mr. EFTA00614563 Page 6 Sloman, was pursuing his right to review the Agreement through meetings and filings with the Department of Justice in Washington IU, a review process that

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 10-CV-21586-ASG PODHURST ORSECK, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Amended Notice and Motion for Leave to Depo