Epstein Secrets

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

of a trial. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of "broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding cha

elled self-incrimination in connection with civil litigation, a court can stay discovery or the entire civil case. Diaz'. Jenne, 2007 WL 624286 al (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cooke, J.). "However, 'the Constitution does not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of related criminal procee

Dexter (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:36 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. Marie, 31 Does Epstein's lawyer not want th

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:44 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. I li Dexter — Jay's complaint was that we we

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-C1V-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

AFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:44 PM To: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. Hi Dexter — Jay's complaint was that we were

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order

AFLS) From: Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:38 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Cc: Senior, Robert (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Revised Notification to Victims regarding right to see Epstein agreement. Marie, Does Epstein's lawyer not want the v

r attorney to represent her in the context of civil litigation, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does 1 and 2, S.D. Fl. Court File No. 08-80736-C1V-MARRA, and advise her accordingly." What do you think? This was my original language: "In addition, a judge has order