Epstein Secrets

al Agents or I had ever discussed lawsuits or even restitution with any victim during any of their interviews and that First Assistant U.S. Attorney Sloman had never met any of the victims, this was exactly the type of cross-examination that I anticipated Epstein's attorneys would try at a trial. The O

hat is? A: No, sir. TIEN: How many women and how many men came to your house? A: I want to say two ladies and two guys. TIEN: Did someone named Jeffrey Sloman come to your house? A: I don't know names, sir. 'HEN: Do you know who Jeffrey Sloman is? A: No, sir. * * * TIEN: And you say you don't know wh

hat? 16 A. I do now. 17 Q. You agree that court is a very serious 18 matter? 19 A. Yes. 20 O. And you're here with your Lawyer 21 Mr. Leopold, right? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. And you know that Mr. Leopold recently 24 filed a lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein, 25 seeking fif

our client to agree to unconscionable contract terms cannot square with the true facts of this case. As explained in letters from Messrs. Acosta and Sloman, the indictment was postponed for more than five months to allow you and Mr. Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the Office to convi

of a trial. Sincerely, R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney cc: R. Alexander Acosta, U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney You also accuse me of "broaden[ing] the scope of the investigation without any foundation for doing so by adding cha

ntra,. ass. an protected. If yea know thtooh any other soda of tencedoda. you may answer. Ter Plllaatl M. bT M. 1.11/0 O. You Mn no Woe an Ns. Leopold tiled • gat, allicad011at lawsuit on pa behalf zzzzzzz ]allhy M. MPOLO, Sae* ableCtIon. to not moat tat capstan II It's through dascattoo th

proof beyond a reasonable doubt that each of them was a victim of an enumerated offense." (emphasis added). First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see December 6, 2007 letter from Mr. Sloman to M

frey Sloman used similar language in tying the names of the "victims" to the basis for a potential indictment, see December 6, 2007 letter from Mr. Sloman to Mr. Lefkowitz at 2, 3; see also your email to Mr. Lefkowitz and Mr. Black on August 14, 2008 at 3:27 p.m., where you state that the list contains

hat? 16 A. I do now. 17 Q. You agree that court is a very serious 18 matter? 19 A. Yes. 20 Q. And you're here with your lawyer 21 Mr. Leopold, right? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. And you know that Mr. Leopold recently 24 filed a lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein, 25 seeking fif

ow who that is? A. No, sir. Q. How many women and how many men came to your house? A. 1 want to say two ladies and two guys. Q. Did someone named Jeffrey Sloman come to your house? A. | don't Know names, sir. Q Do you Know who Jeffrey Sloman is? A. No, sir. Q Do you Know who Jeffrey Herman is? A Yes. Page 3

al background. Do you know that? A. | do now. Q. You agree that court is a very serious matter? A. Yes. Q. And you're here with your lawyer Mr. Leopold, right? A. Yes. Q. And you know that Mr. Leopold recently Filed a lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein, seeking fifty million dollars.