Epstein Secrets

orized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008517 Thru P-008535 6/25/2007 Letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman and Andrew Lourie [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel upon lift of stay by I Ith

onship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?)" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from J. Sloman Attorney-Client Privilege Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings

o J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e- mail from A. Lourie to M. Menchel, J. Sloman, A. Marie Villafafia re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Work Product Government Communication; No Attorney- Client Relationship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding

jections P-0133303 proposed letter to J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e- mail from A. Lourie to M. Menchel, J. Sloman, A. Marie Villafafia re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Work Product Government Communication; No Attorney- Client Relationship; Claims

orized release; Material Severable; Redaction; No Assertion by Victims Box #2 P-008517 Thru P-008535 6/25/2007 Letter from Gerald Lefcourt to Jeffrey Sloman and Andrew Lourie [pursuant to Court's Order, not being withheld as privileged — will be produced to opposing counsel upon lift of stay by 11th C

onship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding Need; Attorney Conduct at Issue Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Leflcowitz (was this sent?)" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from J. Sloman Attorney-Client Privilege Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinning

o J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e- mail from A. Lourie to M. Menchel, J. Sloman, A. Marie Villafafta re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Work Product Government Communication; No Attorney- Client Relationship; Claims Against Public Prosecutor; Overriding

jections P-0133303 proposed letter to J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e- mail from A. Lourie to M. Menchel, J. Sloman, A. Marie Villafafta re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Work Product Government Communication; No Attorney- Client Relationship; Claims

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Sloman. Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:26 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Epstein Fyi Se

bpoena to Paul A. Lavery (return date 5/29/07) 59 5/22/2007 Andrew Cootie Gerald B. Lefcourt Letter requesting to meet with Matthew Menchel and Jeffrey Sloman and \ lc\ Acosta prior to an indictment being filed 28 5/22/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman; cc: A. Marie Villafalia Andrew Laurie Email

/2008 VilLiana letter to Capt. Sleeth, Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, mganling Epstein's work release application 85 6/9/2009 Vadatla Memorandum to Sloman, Senior, Garcia, awl Atkinson seeking permission to declare breach with attachments awl proposal breach letter 86 6/9/2009 Signed indictment packa

ll disclose even more. If meeting is held, Villafaiii will ask to have the case reassigned. Attached email correspondence between Andrew Laurie and G. Lefcourt 28/C-4 5/31/2007 Subpoena to J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation, Inc. (return date 6/21/07) 5/31/2007 Subpoena to J. Epstein & Company, Inc. (re

in the federal investigation. The case was then assigned to AUSA Anne Marie Villafana, who was supervised by AUSA Andy Lourie and then First AUSA Jeffrey Sloman. Each of Mr. Epstein's attorneys, including Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Alan Dershowitz, Alan Dershowitz's brother, Nat Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Jay

ively represent him in the civil litigation. In attempting to ensure compliance with the NPA's civil remedy provisions, both Ms. Villafana and Mr. Sloman repeatedly acted well beyond the scope of their authority as federal criminal prosecutors to assist civil litigants in the Epstein cases. Ms. Villaf

l) promised to close the money-laundering investigation only "if the sex offense case is resolved." See August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation into other areas as well. The matter has not been,

e Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of victims who are not parties to this litigation Box #3 P-013227 April 23, 2008 Memo from Jeffrey Sloman to Office of Professional Responsibility re Self Reporting, Corrected Version of the previously submitted April 21, 2008 Letter to OPR Privacy Ac

ter with attorney handwritten notes Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru P-013337 File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from responding to J. Lefkowitz's letter Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product

/18/08 Lefkowitz Ltr to AMCV" containing handwritten draft notes for proposed letter to J. Lefkowitz; 5/22/07 e-mail from to M. re meeting with G. Lefcourt with attached email from G. Lefcourt re solicitation for meetings Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013304 Thru P-013325

d as a sex offender and objected to any sentence short of incarceration. The Assistant State Attorney in charge of the sex-crimes unit reported Mr. Sloman's conduct during the proceedings as "outrageous." The defendant's attorney described Mr. being "out of control." Shortly after, Mr. began publicl

approval) promised to close the money-laundering investigation "if the sex offense case is resolved." See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter froze to G. Lefcourt ("In other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation into other areas as well. The matter has not been,

t responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “

) promised to close the money-laundering investigation “if the sex offense case is resolved.” See Tab 23, August 16, 2007 Letter from M. Villafana to G. Lefcourt (“In other words, if the sex offense case is resolved, the Office would close its investigation into other areas as well. The matter has not been, an