Epstein Secrets

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 6:15 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Epstein Sorry, forgot to cc you. From: S

of any issue not resolved by the parties through further discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SLACK, ESQ. By /wg cc: Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Robert Senior, Esq. Black, Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf, P.A. EFTA00193777 ROY BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK SCOTT A. KORNSPAN LARRY A. STUMP

Psalms" that she obtained from a religious store (DT 152:1-14). Under the circumstances, her claim for damages against EPSTEIN, one of L.M.'s many "Johns" during that same period, would be so incredible and certainly not likely to produce the extraordinary settlements promised to "RRA's investors."

do not fit within any proper construction of any of the federal criminal statutes under consideration. • 4 First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman sought to preclude Mr. Epstein or his agents from communicating with the alleged "victims." See November 5, 2007 Letter from J. Sloman, Exhibit I. D

due to a procedure available under state law, and following the wave of recent lawsuits that have been filed against Mr. Epstein (ironically by Mr. Sloman's former law partner), we have been able to engage in discovery and take sworn statements from several of the alleged victims. These statements, wh

s traditional pimps—those who recruit underage women and influence or require them to engage in sexual acts with third parties—not the third- party "Johns" who unwittingly solicit an underage prostitute acting under the influence of a pimp. Needless to say, there is no evidence whatsoever that Mr. Eps

ignificant and often rancorous internal debate.” Jeffrey Sloman, who was second-in-command to then-U.S. Attorney

secret plea deal with the wealthy New York hedge fund manager has come under federal scrutiny. In his first public comments on the 10-year-old case, Jeffrey H. Sloman — who at the time was second in command under Acosta at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126 --- PAGE BREAK --- Miami — said prose

es for children’s civil liberties. “ They kept it secret and they didn’t charge the co-conspirators. The horror of this is if you don’t hold all the ‘Johns’ accountable, then it doesn’t stop. This case involved multiple girls, multiple men, multiple recruiters, multiple times and he recruited girls to ge

t responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “

Epstein is prepared to plead guilty and accept a sentence for that offense—a sentence that, notably, is far more severe than that meted out to other “Johns” convicted of violating Florida’s solicitation laws for cases in which sexual activity was alleged. Though CEOS points out its admirable goal of “pr