Epstein Secrets

in the federal investigation. The case was then assigned to AUSA Anne Marie Villafana, who was supervised by AUSA Andy Lourie and then First AUSA Jeffrey Sloman. Each of Mr. Epstein's attorneys, including Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, Alan Dershowitz, Alan Dershowitz's brother, Nat Dershowitz, Ken Starr, Jay

ively represent him in the civil litigation. In attempting to ensure compliance with the NPA's civil remedy provisions, both Ms. Villafana and Mr. Sloman repeatedly acted well beyond the scope of their authority as federal criminal prosecutors to assist civil litigants in the Epstein cases. Ms. Villaf

sel, confirming that "I understand that the plea and sentence will occur on or before the January 4th [2008] date." See October 31, 2007 Email from J. Sloman to J. Lefkowitz (emphasis added). On November 5, 2007, despite Mr. Sloman's having sent the October 31 email only a week earlier, after learning th

negotiations Work Product Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 12 8/3/2007 Email from Marie Villafafia to Matt Menchel, Andrew Lourie, Jeff Sloman, and Karen Atkinson regarding draft response to correspondence from Epstein counsel and planned investigative steps if agreement cannot be reache

request to delay his change of plea WP DP 83 11/2/2007-11/5/2007 emails between AMCV and Jeff Sloman regarding drafting 11/5/2007 letter from Sloman to Lefkowitz WP DP 84 11/5/2007-11/7/2007 emails from AMCV to Jeff Sloman inquiring about status of matter and contact by Epstein investigators

ts of victims who are not parties to this litigation Suppl. Box #3 P-013282 Thru P-013283 7/9/08 Email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger letter re victim notification Attorney-Client Privilege Work product Deliberative Proce

Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Senior, Robert (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 3:25 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Cc: Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: RE: Epstein Marie, are you back ? We need to spend some time together on the indictment. I

LP Response to Letter by FAUSA Sloman Dated May 19, 2008 In a May 19, 2008 letter to Jay Lelkowitz (See Tab I), SDFL First Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman provided what purported to be a summary of the events that have occurred during the investigation of Mr. Epstein. Mr. Sloman's letter is fraught wi

ts responsibility to select the attorney representative for the alleged victims to an independent third-party." See Tab I, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. Sloman, p. 4, f.3. The Truth: • That such an assignment was the SDFL's "unilateral" decision is false. Before the SDFL decided to assign selection of th

d as a sex offender and objected to any sentence short of incarceration. The Assistant State Attorney in charge of the sex-crimes unit reported Mr. Sloman's conduct during the proceedings as "outrageous." The defendant's attorney described Mr. being "out of control." Shortly after, Mr. began publicl

n's attorneys stating that "I intend to notify the victims by letter after COB Thursday [two days later]." See Tab 34, November 27, 2007 Email from J. Sloman to J. Lelkowitz. 42. The morning of November 28, attorneys for Mr. Epstein faxed a letter to Assistant Attorney General Alice Fisher, requesting a

er with attorney handwritten notes Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013334 Thru P-013337 File folder entitled "11/13/07 Sloman to Lefkowitz (was this sent?)" containing draft 11/13/07 letter from J. Sloman responding to J. Lefkowitz's letter Attorney-Client Privilege Wo

ts of victims who are not parties to this litigation Suppl. Box #3 P-013282 Thru P-013283 7/9/08 Email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger letter re victim notification Attorney-Client Privilege Work product Deliberative Proce

. (USAFLS) From: Villatana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:22 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Cc: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Subject: Revised Declaration I removed the sentence about why the Palm Beach Police contacted FBI for ass

the Government's previously made representation that it is not vouching for the veracity of any claim by any identified individual. See Letter from J. Sloman to E. MO 0/25/07). Second, please note also that we do not understand your request that Mr. Epstein and his attorneys execute the rider / acknowled

C. (USAFLS) From: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:35 PM To: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS); Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS); Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Cc: Kuyrkendall, E N. (MM) (FBI); Richards, Jason R. (MM) (FBI); Lee, Dexter (USAFLS) Subject: FW: Jeffr

the Government's previously made representation that it is not vouching for the veracity of any claim by any identified individual. See Letter from J. Sloman to E. (10/25/07). Second, please note also that we do not understand your request that Mr. Epstein and his attorneys execute the rider / acknowled

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Sloman, Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 5;15 PM To: Villafana, Ann Mane C. (USAFLS); Acosta. Alex (USAFLS): Atkinson, Karen (USAFLS) Cc: K

the Government's previously made representation that it is not vouching for the =un ity of any claim by any identified individual. See Letter from J. Sloman to E. (10/25/07). Second, please note also that we do not understand your request that Mr. Epstein and his attorneys execute the rider / acknowled

t responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “

nt representation that “/T]/he SDFL indicated a willingness to defer to the State the length of incarceration...” See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. Sloman, p. 2. This statement is simply not true. Contrary to Mr. Sloman’s assertion, federal prosecutors refused to accept what the State believed to be app

t responds to CEOS’s assessment of its limited review of Mr. Epstein’s case; and a point-by- point rebuttal to First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman’s recent letter which we believe contains factual inaccuracies typical of our correspondence from the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “

ent representation that “/T]he SDFL indicated a willingness to defer to the State the length of incarceration...” See Tab 1, May 19, 2008 Letter from J. Sloman, p. 2. This statement is simply not true. Contrary to Mr. Sloman’s assertion, federal prosecutors refused to accept what the State believed to be app