Epstein Secrets

of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." I. The Alleged "Leak" to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (NO). While the District's PIO was on annual

From: Garcia, Rolando (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 10:26 AM To: (USAFLS) Subject: Epstein Where are we at in the plea negotiations? Tracking: 268 Case

d me that the scheduling delay was caused by the unavailability of Judge McSorley. You promised that a date would be set promptly. On November 15th, Rolando Garcia met with Barry Krisher on another matter, and was told by Mr. Krisher that he had just spoken with Jack Goldberger, and that Mr. Epstein's plea and

on's theory of the case and the plea negotiations. 45. Mr. Thomas's calls to the USAO initially were referred to Assistant United States Attorney David Weinstein. AUSA Weinstein informed Mr. Thomas that federal authorities were considering charging Mr. Epstein under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591, 2422 and 2423, and tol

, September 24, 2007 Email from J. Lefkowitz to M. 22. Ms. replied that she had "forwarded your message only to Alex [Acosta], Andy [Lourie], and Rolando [Garcia]. I don't anticipate it going any further than that." Id. 23. Ms. stated that the agreement would be "placed in the case file, which will

of the Agreement requires an unusual and unprecedented threatened application of federal law." 1. The Alleged "Leak" to the New York Times. AUSA David Weinstein became involved in this matter in his capacity as back up for the District's Public Information Officer (PIO). While the District's PIO was on annua

Sloman, am writing this letter, I will continue to refer to myself as "First Assistant USA Sloman" or "FAUSA Sloman" to help reduce any confusion. Rolando Garcia replaced Mr. Lourie as the Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division. Confidential and Privileged — Attorney Work Product -2- EFTA00225179 with Crimi

Criminal Division Anne Schultz, Chief, Appellate Division Gerardo Simms, Chief, Asset Forfeiture Division Wendy A. Jacobus, Chief, Civil Division David Weinstein, Chief, PINS Karen Gilbert, Chief, Narcotics Eric Bustillo, Chief, Economic and Environmental Crimes Section Rick Del Toro, Chief, Major Crimes Se

l Crimes Section Rick Del Toro, Chief, Major Crimes Section Ben Greenberg, Chief, Special Prosecutions Roger Stefin, Deputy Chief, Ft. Lauderdale Rolando Garcia, Deputy Chief, West Palm Beach Diana Acosta, Acting Deputy Chief, Ft. Pierce From: Annette Castillo Cyndee Campos Executive Division July 1, 20

ions, but also sharing with him details about your Office's theory concerning what laws you believe Mr. Epstein has violated. In broad strokes, Mr. David Weinstein told Mr. Thomas that the Office was contemplating charging Mr. Epstein under Sections 2422(b) (with a full discussion of principal liability), 2423.

ic." See Tab 27, September 24, 2007 Email from J. Lefkowitz to M. 22. Ms. replied that she had "forwarded your message only to [=], (Loune], and Rolando [Garcia]. I don't anticipate it going any further than that." Id. 23. Ms. stated that the agreement would be "placed in the case file, which will

cription Privilege(s) Asserted P-014059 thru P-014061 9/6/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia, Jeff Sloman, Andrew Lourie Drew Oosterbaan, and Rolando Garcia regarding status of plea negotiations, draft agreements, and need to confer with victims Work Product Deliberative Process P-014062 thru P-0140

arges and factual proffer Work Product Deliberative Process P-014157 thru P-014160 9/21/2007 emails between Marie Villafafia and Andrew Lourie, Rolando Garcia, Karen Atkinson, and John McMillan regarding revisions to the non-prosecution agreement Work Product Deliberative Process P-014161 9/21/

in Work Product Deliberative Process Investigative Privilege 6(e) P-014632 thru P-014646 2/21/2008-2/27/2008 emails between Marie Villafafia, David Weinstein, Robert Senior, Karen Atkinson, and Rolando Garcia regarding notifying DOD's Civil Rights Division regarding the status of the case and the planne