4
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
e that the defendant "knowingly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e., that he intended to commit the crime. I 1 th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowin
Page: EFTA02857524_p10 →a minor to engage in prostitution, even though no evidence was introduced that the calls were routed through interstate channels. United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, 1180 (11th Cir. 2007). The Eleventh Circuit then held: Telephones and cellular telephones are instrumentalities of interstate comm
Page: EFTA02857524_p11 →e a minor to engage in prostitution, even though no evidence was introduced that the calls were routed through interstate channels. United States v. Evans , 476 F.3d 1176, 1180 (11th Cir. 2007). The Eleventh Circuit then held: Telephones and cellular telephones are instrumentalities of interstate comm
Page: EFTA02857732_p6 →e that the defendant "knowingly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e. , that he intended to commit the crime. 11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowing
Page: EFTA02857732_p30 →e a minor to engage in prostitution, even though no evidence was introduced that the calls were routed through interstate channels. United States v. Evans , 476 F.3d 1176, 1180 (11th Cir. 2007). The Eleventh Circuit then held: Telephones and cellular telephones are instrumentalities of interstate comm
Page: EFTA02857763_p6 →e that the defendant "knowingly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e. , that he intended to commit the crime. 11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowing
Page: EFTA02857763_p46 →e a minor to engage in prostitution, even though no evidence was introduced that the calls were routed through interstate channels. United States v. Evans , 476 F.3d 1176, 1180 (1Ith Cir. 2007). The Eleventh Circuit then held: EFTA02857815 Telephones and cellular telephones are instrumentalities of
Page: EFTA02857810_p6 →e that the defendant "knowingly and willfully intended to commit the offense" — i.e. , that he intended to commit the crime. 11th Cir. Pattern Jury Instr., Special Instr. 11 ("Attempt(s)") (2003). Where, as here, the offense is completed, the statutory language requires only that the defendant knowing
Page: EFTA02857810_p29 →Entities connected to both Evans and Instr

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Cleveland
LOCATION
Philadelphia
LOCATION
Colorado
LOCATIONGerald Lefcourt
PERSONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATION
Barry Diller
PERSON
Nelson
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON