Epstein Secrets

ulation). Rather, its reach is limited to sex trafficking that involves children or is accomplished by force, fraud, or coercion". United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, 1179 n. 1 (11* Cir. 2007). Nor, has the Department of Justice deemed it appropriate. See, e.g. United States Department of Justice C

ecause it authorized agents to seize everything, even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States v. Clough, 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); U

egulation). Rather, its reach is limited to sex trafficking that Involves children or is accomplished by force, fraud, or coercion". United States. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, 1179 n. 1 (II* Cir. 2007). Nor, has the Department of Justice deemed it appropriate. See, e.g. United States Department of Justice C

because it authorized agents to seize everything, even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States. Clough; 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); U

ulation). Rather, its reach is limited to sex trafficking that involves children or is accomplished by force, fraud, or coercion". United States v. Evans, 476 F.3d 1176, 1179 n. 1(11' Cir. 2007). Nor, has the Department of Justice deemed it appropriate. See, e.g. United States Department of Justice Ci

ecause it authorized agents to seize everything, even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States v. Clough; 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); U

ulation). Rather, its reach is limited to sex trafficking that involves children or is accomplished by force, fraud, or coercion". United States v. Evans, 476 F.ad 1176, 1179 n. 1 (1 I th Cir. 2007). Nor, has the Department of Justice deemed it appropriate. See, e.g. United States Department of Justic

because it authorized agents to seize everything even if unrelated to the offense under investigation and even if wholly personal); United States'. Clough, 246 F.Supp.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003Xwarrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); Un