Epstein Secrets

lts of the continued investigation (Exhibit B-38). The agents continued locating and interviewing more victims (see, e.g., Exhibit B-126). When DAG Filip agreed to consider Epstein's challenges, the planned grand jury presentation was canceled (Exhibit B-40). Even after that delay, the agents and I p

with resolving the case against Epstein. In November and December 2006, subpoenas were served on two other Epstein employees — Janusz Banasiak and Mucinska. Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, Mr. Banasiak was satisfied with I standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Muc

)I lice OI the Dupnly Attorney General (haled titates Department tif Just ice 050 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington. 0.4'. 70530 Dc.ir Judy.: Filip: May :7, 2008 Pk 0. I: it /c., & Bird LLP The t dated Kidder: ' 19. 1 .mteet. NW *.e .!:“;;;;;Pti. ; ":5‘4 rdh -i1P"-; pv who lin.w.d.e.

2423(b) and 2. FORFEITURE 1 Upon conviction of the violation alleged in Count I of this indictment, the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, SARAH KELFN, Mucinska," and , shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the violation

29/2008 Email from Jell Sloman to Marie Villafafta, Bob Senior, Karen Atkinson, E. Nesbitt KtnTkendaII, and Jason Richards informing them that l)AG Filip agreed to review matter and that grand jury presentation was canceled 13-41 8/28/2008 Letter front Michael Danchuk to Marie Villafaila regarding

asiak Both initially asked for immunity. After speaking with Banasiak's attorney, r. anasi was satisfied with a standard Kastigar letter, but Ms. Mucinska's attorney was insistent on formal immunity, and as noted above, so was Individual #28. I don't believe that, prior to this investigation, I had ev