Epstein Secrets

duct Suppl. Box #3 P-013373 Thru P-013503 File folder labeled "6/3/08 Sloman Submission to the DAG" containing 6/3/08 letter from J. Sloman to Mark Filip, Office of the DAG, cc'd to R. Senior, A. Marie Villafafia, K. Atkinson, re Jeffrey Epstein, detailing events concerning the Agreement and thereaf

" containing attorney research Work product Box #1 P-003679 Thru P-003680 File folder entitled "Serene Cano (N.Y. AUSA)" containing attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes Work product Box #1 P-003681 Thru P-003687 File folder entitled "Dr. Anna Salter" containing attorney (Villafafia) memo to

LY-01 through OLY-81, correspondence and research related to enforcement of same, documents produced in response to some subpoenas; and attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes 6(e) Work Product Contains documents subject to investigative privilege Also contains documents subject to privacy rights of

Issue Suppl. Box #3 P413373 Thru P-013503 File folder labeled "6/3/08 Sloman Submission to the DAG" containing 6/3/08 letter from J. Sloman to Mark Filip, Office of the DAG, cc'd to R. Senior, A. Marie Villaftula, K. Atkinson, re Jeffrey Epstein, detailing events concerning the Agreement and thereaf

Public Prosecutor, Attorney Conduct at Issue Box #1 P-004561 Thru P-004565 Filed folder entitled "JANUSZ BANASIAK" containing attorney (Villafafla) handwritten notes of interview Work product Investigative privilege • Inadequate Log; No Factual Underpinnings; Fiduciary Duty; Not in Anticipa

of Florida First Assistant U.S. Attorney 991V.E. 4th Street Miami, FL 33132 (303) 961-9100 DELIVERY BY FEDERAL_ EXPRESS June 3, 2008 honorable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epst

osta met with Kirkland & Ellis partners Jay Lefkowitz and former Solicitor General Ken Starr and Ms. Sanchez, along with Chief Oosterbahn and AUSAs Villafafla, John McMillan, and FAUSA S lomat' Messrs. Starr and Lefkowitz presented arguments regarding the sufficiency of the federal interest in the case and