Epstein Secrets

twi ttttt triV17.:IC:cr :!1-6:44.1•Stb.% “ I'•rDerplfil : ray :1; 6%0 SSL's Lmarrnlarldaihkt sue VIA F&CSIMILI:: (2021 514-(14(10 I lonor.tole Mark Filip H 40: 01 the Udtul y Attorney General t inilcrt Sties l)epartntent or) ma ice ti50 PelifegyiVania Avenue. N.W. 1(153t/ May 27, 2008 Jne A Winn

) has already determined that our Substantive arguments regarding why a federal prosecution of Mr. 149nein is not unrranied were - compelling.- I Inwever. in contradiction to Mr. Sloinairs acsenion that CLOS had provided an independent. dr ;uwn review. CFOS made clear that it did not tin so. indeed. r

lnacani. :N.: i 171. ..4:4:::444.1181, F44 4‘ rivtristdrYfrJa..II:Igai May 27, 2008 fn rACS1M(.11:: <2021 514-0467 CONNOKA177.4/. I lottomhle Mark Filip ( /like blthe l)epiity adarnincy General I initial States Department °rho:lice Q50 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.V.'. WaShi !Wien. D.C. 7.0531) Dear Ju

ON-1 has already determined dim our sultstanube arguments regarding why a federal prosecution of Mr. h.pinein is not nu:timed were "compelling.- I Inwever. in euniradielion In Mr. Sloman's assertion that CliQS had provided an independent. de unto review. CMS; made clear that it did nol. du sit. indeed.

mation EFTA01718497 vu, us, U. tr). A, :514 r CIII.*:'::20eS 1? i t PAW • GAIAAJLAVE urrium owitowse SIU1.14 6200 41/013 Iii I !anorak,: Mark Vilip MA" 27. 211011 rage li? :hal tilw Swtc Attorney has nil:. despite J ;V.I. It. INC '.Ii. lipetein's counsel must also sueccesittlly expedite a pl

eady tleierntined that our 7:tilothinet..t: arson:ems regualing why a federal proseeuti In t . !Vs. Itpsotin is not oar:anted wen: "compc•Ilin;.- I Inwever. in contr.:diction to Mr assertion that CEOS had proviths,1 an indent:lid:Mt. de Punt roele.. •. CFOS made clear t.tal tt t. i ma. do ND. indeed.,