Epstein Secrets

e S.D.Fla. had acted within its discretion. Epstein's attorneys next sought review at the DAG level, which resulted in then Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip finding that the S.D.Fla. had appropriated exercised its prosecutorial discretion. The documents sought include letters from Epstein's attorneys see

and e-mail traffic. No. 8: Plaintiffs seek documents relating to Epstein's efforts, after the execution of the NPA in September 2007, to appeal to Main Justice to obtain a more favorable outcome. I understand he first appealed to CEOS, which found the S.D.Fla. had acted within its discretion. Epstein's att

NS IN THE EPSTEIN, CO-CONSPIRATOR CASE PROVIDES YET ANOTHER LAYER OF CONCEALMENT Firstly the plea was signed by five DOJ Officials including Deputy AG Mark Filip, Alice S. Fisher, Assistant AG in charge of the Criminal Division and Sigal Mandelker, Deputy Assistant AG, among others. This means that these DOJ

ndrews Plaza New York, NY 10007 Dear Mr December 18, 2020 When Martin Weinberg disclosed in open court during the bail hearing in July 2019 that Main Justice was responsible for the Epstein, et al "Sweetheart Deal of the Century", that fact has been "obscured" ever since. (I can only find one report of t

riate word, not "negotiate".) In terms of a boss, the U.S. Attorneys' Offices report through the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (at the time, Mark Filip was the DAG.) EFTA00206394

ous email) Thanks for your patience. I checked into your two questions on who was the USA's boss and why the "defense was allowed to negotiate with Main Justice", as you put it. Here's what I have for you — The Office of the Deputy Attorney General did review the case, which is not uncommon, and determined

tant Attorney General Sigal Mandelker Deputy Assistant Attorney General Andrew Oosterbaan Chief, CEOS Office of the Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip Deputy Attorney General John Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General A. February - May 15, 2008: Review by CEOS and the Criminal Divisi

was up to whomever they asked.” The next day, Lefkowitz followed up with Acosta in an email: We appreciate that you will afford us as much time as Main Justice determines is appropriate for it to conduct a review of this matter. As you have suggested, we will initiate that review process with Drew Ooster