Epstein Secrets

s regarding Epstein not wanting underage girls providing him massages would have been required to be disclosed to Epstein's defense attorneys under Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 (1963). If the government ever chose to call her as a prosecution witness, the government would have been obligated to discl

cution of Epstein might still occur. Even though petitioners do not dispute that Epstein sought review at the DOJ, first at the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, then at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, they dismiss the Government's argument as "resorts to technicalities." D.E

s regarding Epstein not wanting underage girls providing him massages would have been required to be disclosed to Epstein's defense attorneys under Brady v. Maryland 373 U.S. 83 (1963). If the government ever chose to call her as a prosecution witness, the government would have been obligated to discl

cution of Epstein might still occur. Even though petitioners do not dispute that Epstein sought review at the DOJ, first at the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, then at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, they dismiss the Government's argument as "resorts to technicalities." ■.

r statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

ed concerns regarding our prosecution. To ensure a full consideration of your arguments, I invited Drew Oosterbaan, Chief of the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, to travel from Washington to attend our meeting. During the September 7th meeting, your co-counsel, Mr. Lefkowitz, offered a

r statements, their credibility and the foundations, if any, for claiming personal injury. Also, Mr. Epstein would have received, pursuant to either Brady or Jencks, material in the form of prior inconsistent statements made by these women before they learned of any financial benefit that may be avail

d to present federalism-based regarding ur prosecution. To ensure a Ml consideration of your arguments, 1 invite Chief of the Criminal Division's Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, to travel from Washington to attend our meeting. During the September 7th meeting, your co-counsel, Mr. Lefkowitz, offered a