Epstein Secrets

ldber e et with Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krisher and Assistant State Attorney to discuss

On or about July 15, 2004, DefendantIMEMS placed one or niorii telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. (67) On or about July 16, 2004, Defendan caused Jane Doe #9 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #10. (68) On or about July 17, 2004, Defendant telephone c

defendant's Compaq Presario notebook computer. Barry Gummow, a computer forensic examiner, was called

14. The district court observed that "the lessee's consent to the instant search of the spare bedroom provides an independent g reason to deny the Defendan ' . n to suppress. See United Stain 979 1 i 2c1 77, 79 (6th Cir.1992); unite tales Clutter, 914 F.2d 775, 777 (6th r.1990), cert. denied,499 U

IN) 4-14 N, r^r-) 13 ON BEHALF OP THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 Nor

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely m mad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosu

PUCILtark., 1.-;; 13 ON BEHALF OF THE STATE: BARRY E. KRISCHER, ESQUIRE 14 State Attorney 401 Nor

urth District would reverse ling since the proper procedures for sealing the NPA were never followed. As to likelihood of harm, the only reference Defendan to this issue is in paragraph 3 of his motion. Here, Defendant merely ad assertion that there will be "irreparable harm caused by the disclosure

press and to complain loudly about State Attorney Barry Krisher's handling of the case. Giving the infor

he masturbated. 8 EFTA02857682 (5) In or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $300 to Jane Doe #2. (6) In or around 2001, Defendan placed a telephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to 358 El Brillo Way. (7) In or arou