Epstein Secrets

12/2011 fa REPLY to Response to Motion rein MOTION to Intervene of Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz filed by Roy Black, Jay Lefkowitz, Martin G. Weinberg. (Perczek, Jacqueline) (Entered: 05/12/2011) 05/16/2011 El RESPONSE in Opposition rel2 MOTION to Intervene MOTION for Sanctions Jane Doe #1 and Ja

f Supplemental Authority of the United States Supreme Court (Doc. 163); and Reply in Support of Supplemental Briefing By Limited Intervenors Black, Weinberg, Leticowitz, and Epstein (Doc. 169). 4 EFTA00177814 already addressed the issue in Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(0 and Fed. R. Evid. 410 and did not see fi

EDT 2 of 16 Roy Black Black, Srebnick, Komspan &Stumpf, P.A. 201 South Biscayne Boulevard Suite1300 Miami, FL 33131 305-371-6421 intervenor Martin G. Weinberg J ntervenor Jay Lefkowitz represented by Jacqueline Perczek Black Srebnick Komspan &Stumpf 201 S Biscayne Boulevard Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 3

1992). Mr. Epstein has a Due Process right to the continued specific performance and enforcement of the non-prosecution agreement. United States v. Haber, 299 Fed. Appx. 865, 867 (11th Cir. 2008). Rescission of the non-prosecution agreement at this juncture would, moreover, undermine Mr. Epstein's re

E DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant tc INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDINWCPPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby request that this Honorable Court stay its order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188), denying their Motion for a

f Supplemental Authority of the United States Supreme Court (Doc. 163); and Reply in Support of Supplemental Briefing By Limited Intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowitz, and Epstein (Doc. 169). 4 EFTA00205363 representing a client under federal investigation have an obligation to secure the best possib

. 1992). Mr. Epstein has a Due Process right to the continued specific performance and enforcement of the non-prosecution agreement. United States I Haber, 299 < Fed. Aipx. 865, 867 (11th Cir. 2008). Rescission of the non-prosecution agreement at this juncture would, moreover, undermine Mr. Epstein's

E DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant tc INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDINWCPPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby request that this Honorable Court stay its order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188), denying their Motion for a

f Supplemental Authority of the United States Supreme Court (Doc. 163); and Reply in Support of Supplemental Briefing By Limited Intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowitz, and Epstein (Doc. 169). 4 EFTA00205343 representing a client under federal investigation have an obligation to secure the best possib

. 1992). Mr. Epstein has a Due Process right to the continued specific performance and enforcement of the non-prosecution agreement. United States I Haber, 299 < Fed. Aipx. 865, 867 (11th Cir. 2008). Rescission of the non-prosecution agreement at this juncture would, moreover, undermine Mr. Epstein's

ke dela, y restandock eros c miaow polo o ', ante 'Credited° durante el die. OUT RACER SI CREE QUE NAY UN ERROR EN EL ESTADO DE CUENTA RHAOONADO A WEINER OE at(orto 0 EXTENSION DE CREDIT°. St wee out hay on eer0e su evade de Ctenta, esceawn o lameness • la ,nleonw4, de contemn inclulda abajo En au

days It we caw more than IO babes% days to do thi we will credit your account fur tie mourn roc that is in trot. to thit you will nese the use ohne Marty duo %i the lime takes us to (amp eta Our I:went:atm. EleCtronk Funds Eramfers include eleartbk trhaliCti001 Initiated through an Automated Teller

Omonw UMW* ADD(.) Morris not mead OA MAMMY By the Bank $ TOTAL DEDUCT a ..... Outslanding Checks Mors() ''' '''''''''' S DATE AMOUNT i Haber. S TOTAL IN CASE OF ERRORS OR QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR EIELTRONIC TRANSFERS telephone o writ al the c Onter.l nnfomatiOn worded dram, is son as yOli

TAY PENDING APPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby reque

JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL Intervenors Roy Black, Martin Weinberg, Jay Lefkowitz, and Jeffrey Epstein hereby request that this Honorable Court stay its order of June 18, 2013 (Doc. 188), denying their Motion for a

1992). Mr. Epstein has a Due Process right to the continued specific performance and enforcement of the non-prosecution agreement. United States v. Haber, 299 Fed. Appx. 865, 867 (I I th Cir. 2008). Rescission of the non-prosecution agreement at this juncture would, moreover, undermine Mr. Epstein's

a); and/or Litigation. FOWPA Requester: Martin Weinberg Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Computer or Case Iden

e 5, United States Code, Section 552); Privacy Act of 1974 (PA) (Title 5, United States Code, Section 552a); and/or Litigation. FOWPA Requester: Martin Weinberg Subject: Jeffrey Epstein Computer or Case Identification Number: Title of Case: • File 31E-MM-1080624A Serials Reviewed: All 1O Litigation

`I 33 112- EFTA01695615 1 Dlie le- }ON" Sat Wig wed Mali Pan. kir Mark Pale at IMisten • A/fleet Ian Fka. ROI It. RessIts.reseslas, Haber at lads} Alnalt Worn.. Meisnrcins: EstkornallIMIS Illeasn Mal lb Rotas* 6.t Oc_4#40ii J 'Au G-115,10 N eloSSe 13 <0 -1-60 Ittreiti klei I

E I and JANE DOE 2, 1. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING BY LIMITED INTERVENORS BLACK, WEINBERG, LEFKOWITZ, AND EPSTEIN The limited intervenors Black, Weinberg, Lefkowtiz, and Epstein re-file this reply, which is identical to the reply that wa

ns. Rather than invalidate the agreement, Mr. Epstein has a Due Process right to its continued specific performance and enforcement. United States. Haber, 299 Fed. Appx. 865, 867 (11th Cir. 2008). The remedy the plaintiffs seek cannot be obtained and their request for disclosure and use of the plea n

lots mayor may riot eel lea Cenmiisans. Chavesat Marty reorgivication errs DOISend aryl other rerrinnwi

rie of UBS AG and ream of LOS Stoskie u.0 the Fren'sdnancill swat it eatable uoon reamed the riffs exectere of Kea at a U3S Fowled SOW*. he 1200 Haber lirculwat Nitehaek at N107086 This statement reprewos me only °tidal reard of >ourUBS Finance Woos account Other MOWS. except atoll toe documents

autim, in accordance rah FOIC rules. • Preahalue Prom divined for securities and Met inducts may be higher or lamer than the price that you would Marty recette in the market Prices we obtaned from vaiots third party sources Mite we Delve to be retitle, but we do not q.satee their accuracy. — We g

l ant of UBS AG and /farm of LOS Sooskies u.0 lhefrnts instal swain it eatable upon *cunt the Fronts exeClerealneS at a U3S Fmasdal Swill me 1200 Haber littlfead Yaohaak at NJ 07086 lhis stuntmen reprewcohe only Octal reaed of >wain Emma Servies axount Other MOM* except onset tat documeets. coati

ts at 885 Bank USA are FDIC enured in accordance with FDIC nat. Fa mire ilarnatim pease tsar virmfdic Croons at UBS AG Stanford Broth ad shams of Marty Funds ae rot instred by then:RC. Through the Ok wadi* bete balms are omen to depot/ accounts at UBS AG New York Branched LBS AGC aeon Brach These

trubtraliwit or UBS AG and /Nam of LOS Seoskin LC lhef ass Maria swat it Matt* upon Moat the erm's executmealliCeS at a U3S RIMS SlcroS be 1200 Haber litcalwat Mash* at N107086 This statement represses she ally °keit reaed of amain Honda Secres recount Other reCOMS. except atoll tae documems. c