Epstein Secrets

he federal grand jury investigation, we object under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) to its disclosure absent an appropriate court order. Very truly yours, Martin G. Weinberg cc: Roy Black EFTA00231426 07/22/2011 15:55 3053562006 BSKS PAGE 02 MARTIN G. WEINBERG. P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW nitorEnAz4surreimo EMAIL ADDRE

1 Facsimile: July 27, 2011 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Re: IttfiraMin Dear Mr. Weinberg: Thank you for your letter of July 22, 2011. In order to review and address the objections that you raised in that letter, the Office deferred maki

e 503 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913 Counsel for Petitioner By: - 751SL‘-• ICUI-S. W4 ALSH lorida Bar No. 272371 EFTA00231424 EFTA00231425 MARTIN a WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT TAW 10 PARK PLAZA, SUITE IMO BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 FAX NIGHT EMERGENCY: Assistant United States Attorney United States

er of simply filing a writ of petition and that stays the release of the order. There would have to be a separate motion that would be filed with the Appellate Court. The Motion to Stay that we file under 9.310, subsection A, it party that seeks review Appellate Rule provides that the shall come to the lowe

COMPIANI & VARGAS, P.A. 501 South Flagler Drive, Suite 503 ch, FL 33401-5913 NE 1=1.7; 14 2.-VVALSH lorida Bar No. EFTA00232544 EFTA00232545 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ATTORNEYELAW 20 PARK PLAZA SUMS/OM EMAIL ADDRESSES: IfdriTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 FAX July 22, 2011 Assistant United States Attorney United

csimile: July 27, 2011 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Weinberg: Thank you for your letter of July 22, 2011. In order to review and address the objections that you raised in that letter, the Office deferred maki

er of simply filing a writ of petition and that stays the release of the order. There would have to be a separate motion that would be filed with the Appellate Court. The Motion to Stay that we file under 9.310, subsection A, it party that seeks review Appellate Rule provides that the shall come to the lowe

property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, Commentary at 5, ¶ 7 (2006). Accordingly, the Order 6 By previewing for the Appellate Court "[t]he People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See Mount Lucas

property in Manhattan.2 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

he People's Attempt to Introduce Materials Outside the Record Was Improper and Reference to Such Contentions Should Be Stricken. By previewing for the Appellate Court in their brief "the People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See

property in Manhattan.3 See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg to NYS Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, date

to which Appellant ultimately pled guilty.5 Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7. By so doing, the People themselves unwittingly concede that 5 By previewing for the Appellate Court "the People's evidence on remand," see Resp. Br. at 62, n. 7, the People have improperly introduced materials dehors the record. See Mount Lucas As