Epstein Secrets

he federal grand jury investigation, we object under Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) to its disclosure absent an appropriate court order. Very truly yours, Martin G. Weinberg cc: Roy Black EFTA00231426 07/22/2011 15:55 3053562006 BSKS PAGE 02 MARTIN G. WEINBERG. P.C. ATTORNEY AT LAW nitorEnAz4surreimo EMAIL ADDRE

1 Facsimile: July 27, 2011 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Re: IttfiraMin Dear Mr. Weinberg: Thank you for your letter of July 22, 2011. In order to review and address the objections that you raised in that letter, the Office deferred maki

e 503 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913 Counsel for Petitioner By: - 751SL‘-• ICUI-S. W4 ALSH lorida Bar No. 272371 EFTA00231424 EFTA00231425 MARTIN a WEINBERG, P.C. ATTORNEY AT TAW 10 PARK PLAZA, SUITE IMO BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 FAX NIGHT EMERGENCY: Assistant United States Attorney United States

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

with. See Letter of Peter Schoenburg to Martin G. Weinberg, August 18, 2010 (Exhibit D); see also NMSA 1978

fender reporting statute, notwithstanding his Florida conviction and the conduct alleged in connection therewith. See Letter of Peter Schoenburg to Martin G. Weinberg, August 18, 2010 (Exhibit D); see also NMSA 1978, § 29-11A-3(E). [Do we have the letter from Ms. Chacon in NM Department of Public Safety?] [Is Eps

his SORA designation reflect that fact. B. The Level 3 Calculation by the Board Is Not Supported by Facts or the Law Curiously, the reviewer from the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders recommended that Jeffrey Epstein be designated a Level 3 offender, notwithstanding the absence of any key factors that suggesting that he might pos

14 As Amicas cuicmie: , ESQ. 15 Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 East Broward Boulevard 16 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 954.356.7255 17 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. 18 20 Park Plaza Boston MA 02116 19 (Via telephone) 20 JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (Via telephone) 21 REPORTED BY: LARRY HERR, RPR-RMR-FCRR-

3 MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, we have two members of the 14 defense team are on the phone, also. 15 THE COURT: Who do we have on the phone? 16 MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good morning, Your 17 Honor. 18 MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz. Good morning, Your 19 Honor. 20 THE COURT: Good morning. 21 I

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

COMPIANI & VARGAS, P.A. 501 South Flagler Drive, Suite 503 ch, FL 33401-5913 NE 1=1.7; 14 2.-VVALSH lorida Bar No. EFTA00232544 EFTA00232545 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ATTORNEYELAW 20 PARK PLAZA SUMS/OM EMAIL ADDRESSES: IfdriTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 FAX July 22, 2011 Assistant United States Attorney United

csimile: July 27, 2011 DELIVERY BY FACSIMILE Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Mr. Weinberg: Thank you for your letter of July 22, 2011. In order to review and address the objections that you raised in that letter, the Office deferred maki

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting

ach, FL 33401 14 As Amicas Cunie: , ESQ. 15 Assistant U.S. Attorney 500 East Broward Boulevard 16 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 For U.S.A. 17 MARTIN G. WEINBERG, ESQ. 18 20 Park Plaza Boston MA 02116 19 (Via telephone) 20 JAY LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. (via telephone) 21 REPORTED BY: LARRY HERB RPR-RMR-FCRR-

3 MR. CRITTON: Your Honor, we have two members of the 14 defense team are on the phone, also. 15 THE COURT: Who do we have on the phone? 16 MR. WEINBERG: Martin Weinberg. Good morning, Your 17 Honor. 18 MR. LEFKOWITZ: Jay Lefkowitz. Good morning, Your 19 Honor. 20 THE COURT: Good morning. 21 I

ror based, in part, on the following: (1) the Court improperly relied on untrustworthy double and triple hearsay contained in the recommendation of the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders, even though the District Attorney, as the party appearing on behalf of the State, rejected much of the Board's recommendation as not constituting