Epstein Secrets

ngarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (202)-506-3900 Fax: (212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro lac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 (617) 227-3700 Fax: (6

212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro lac vice forthcom

sues for judicial decision, and (2) the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration."' Id. (quoting Cheffer, 55 F.3d at 1524 (citing Abbott Labs. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 149 (1967))); 6 EFTA00076105 Case 9:08-c 3fi-19464-0CtailltdReta 2ffeeurEenteea o if iractsarmatket GRAB/80131.5Page 8

ons proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Ste toe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 15 EFTA00095885 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19

ingarten Ste toe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcom

sues for judicial decision, and (2) the hardship to the parties of withholding court consideration."' Id. (quoting Cheffer, 55 F.3d at 1524 (citing Abbott Labs. v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136, 149 (1967))); 6 EFTA00095908 Case 9:08-c 3fi-19464-0CtailltdReta 2ffeeurEenteea o if iractsarmatket GRAB/80131.5Page 8

t with the *226 defense by decid- ing after two years that it wanted a new ex- pert. Id. The court also denied as premature Fell's motion to exclude Weiner's testi- mony, holding that the nature and scope of Webees anticipated rebuttal testimony was unclear but that, even without interviewing Fell, hi

factors concerning sentencing." Id. Accordingly, the court declined to rule on admissibility prior to the government's disclosure of the scope of Weiner's projected testimony. Pursuant to the court's April 7 2005 or- der, Wetzel interviewed Fell and prepared a report explaining his findings. Fell, 2

ee also Glen- mede Trust Co.!. Thompson, 56 F.3d 476, 486 (3d Cir.19 5) (finding broad waiver i where advice of counse defense had been asserted); Abbott Labs. . Baxter Travenol Labs., Inc., 676 F. upp. 831, 832 (N.D.I11.1987) (same). Enforcing a prospective waiver in such a case makes sense: once