Epstein Secrets

! IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO Roy Black, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Komspan & Ptumpf 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 March 4, 2010 Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Martin G. Weinberg, PC 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ADELCOJI J. BENAVENTE PAPALEGAL/INVISTIOATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M.

MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN•BARINO BETTY STOKES PARALEGALS RJTA H. BIJDNYK Of COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI OE COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Marty: This letter represents my thoughts on issues concerning the NPA and my ability to fully defend Mr. Epstein in the civil case recently filed by Mr.

her discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SLACK, ESQ. /wg cc: Jeffrey Sloman,

wsuit - you would nevertheless believe that the raising of any of the legal arguments outlined above would violate the NPA Respectfully submitted, MARTIN W BERG, ESQ. ROY B CK, SQ. /wg By Black. Srebnick. Komspan & Stumpf. PA EFTA00194769 BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN,ar YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES A

ation sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Usetyl. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). F1419. Article I contains two Ex Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, c

wsuit - you would nevertheless believe that the raising of any of the legal arguments outlined above would violate the NPA Respectfully submitted, MARTIN W BERG, ESQ. ROY B CK, SQ. /wg By Black. Srebnick, Kornspan & Stumpf. PA EFTA00183815 BURMAN, CRITTON LUTTIER&COLEMAN, LLP YOUR TRUSTED ADVOCATES

IN FLORIDA AND COLORADO Roy Black, Esq. Black, Srebnick, Kornspan & Ptumpf 201 S. Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 1300 Miami, FL 33131 March 4, 2010 Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. Martin G. Weinberg, PC 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ADELCW I J. BENAVENTE PARATEGAViNVESSIGATOR JESSICA CADWELL BOBBIE M.

MCKENNA ASHLIE STOKEN-BARING BETTY STOKES PARALLOALS RITA H. BUONYK OF COUNSEL EDWARD M. RICCI OF COUNSEL Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Roy and Marty: This letter represents my thoughts on issues concerning the NPA and my ability to fully defend Mr. Epstein in the civil case recently filed by Mr.

her discussions. Respectfully submitted, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY LACK, ESQ. By /wg cc: , Esq. Rob

ation sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Useryl. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). FN19. Article 1 contains two Ex Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl

r. Epstein's paramount priority, and ours, is that the terms of Mr. Epstein's agreement with the government be followed and fulfilled. Your truly, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SACK, ESQ. /wg By Black. Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf. I'.A. EFTA00207723 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

t be followed and fulfilled. Your truly, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY SACK, ESQ. /wg By Black. Srebnick.

tion sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). FN19. Article I contains two Er Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl

r. Epstein's paramount priority, and ours, is that the terms of Mr. Epstein's agreement with the government be followed and fulfilled. Your truly, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY LACK, ESQ. /wg By Black. Srebnick. Kornspan & Stumpf. I'.A. EFTA00213247 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

t be followed and fulfilled. Your truly, MARTIN WEINBERG, ESQ. ROY LACK, ESQ. /wg By Black. Srebnick.

tion sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co., 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976). FN19. Article I contains two Er Post Facto Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl