Epstein Secrets

l Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J. A. Background This ruling

fice of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defend

smit Information About a Mi- nor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(3XE). (121 The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutted. Martir, EFTA00066200 316 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 782 F.2d at 1144. If the defendant comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger t

ngarten Steptoe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) 1114 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (202)-506-3900 Fax: (212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro lac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 (617) 227-3700 Fax: (6

212)-506-3950 [email protected] Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro lac vice forthcom

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

fice of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defend

l Campion Miller, Michael Gerard Scavelli, Reid Weingarten, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Marc Allan Fernich, Law Office of Marc Fernich, New York, NY, Martin Gary Weinberg, Martin G. Weinberg, PC, Bos- ton, MA, for Defendant. DECISION & ORDER REMANDING DEFENDANT RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J. A. Background This ruling

smit Information About a Mi- nor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. 3142(e)(3XE). (121 The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutted. Martir, EFTA00076824 316 425 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT, 3d SERIES 782 F.2d at 1144. If the defendant comes forward with evidence that he will not endanger t

ons proposed supra, or any other conditions the Court deems necessary and appropriate. Yours truly, Reid Weingarten Ste toe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcoming) Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. 15 EFTA00095885 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 6 Filed 07/11/19

ingarten Ste toe & Johnson, LLP (NYC) Martin G. Weinberg (application for admission pro hac vice forthcom

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

n federal detention and bail law is: Hon. John L. Weinberg, Federal Bail and Detention Handbook (2003), whi

hould consider those legislative findings among the other factors to be weighed in deciding whether a defendant should be detained. United States'. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986) (internal citations omitted) (discussing 'A grand jury indic nt provides the probable cause required by the sta

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

edings in this case or protect the safety of the community, and that any application for bail should be denied. Southern District of New York Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00024593

nied. Southern District of New York Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for def

REY S. BERMAN United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant EFTA00015545 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page

k Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for def

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

enied. Very truly yours, By: GEOF REY S. BERMAN United States Attome Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00028306

Southern District of New York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for def

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

k Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for def

F REY S. BERMAN United tates Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00029013

.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings); Ferranti, 66 F.3d at 542 (same); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1145 (2d Cir. 1986) (same). Where a judicial officer concludes after a hearing that "no condition or combination of conditions will

enied. Very truly yours, By: GEOF REY S. BERMAN United States Attome Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant Hon. Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge EFTA00030841

Southern District of New York Tel: Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for def