Epstein Secrets

evant to the parties claims and defenses, reasoning that the quasi-privilege for tax returns had not been expressly recognized within the Circuit); Weiner v. Bache Halsey Stuart, Inc., 76 F.R.D. 624, 627 (S.D.Fla.1977) (holding that no privilege attaches to tax returns and that their discoverability t

use an act of production shield to turning over documents whose existence are known to the government or is a foregone conclusion. See, e.g. In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Oct. 29, 1992, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2d Cir. 1993) (rejecting act of production argument because compliance with subpoena requi

REY S. BERMAN United States Attorney By: Assistant United States Attorney Southern District of New York Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for defendant EFTA00015545 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 11-1 Filed 07/12/19 Page

k Tel: (212) 637-2415 / 2225 / 2324 Cc: Martin Weinberg, Esq., and Reid Weingarten, Esq., counsel for def

******************NARRATIvg 1* 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to. On April 5, 2006, at approximately 7:30 p.m., I oersonally served the pare

es of enforcing a judgment, the time remaining to be served must be at least six months." 41. There is no doubt that the conduct referred to in the Grand Jury charges against Ms Ghislaine Maxwell, contained in the Superseding Indictment SI 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), filed on July 8th, 2020, also constitutes crimin

e Policy in Europe Thesis Supervisor Mme Delmas Marty, University of Paris Sorbonne 1999 Certificate