Epstein Secrets

il: DEFENDANT ATTORNEY(S): Kroblin, Christopher Allen [COR LD NTC] Erika A Kellerhals, PC PO Box 608

Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1397 (E.D.Pa. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Ne. Women's Or., Inc. v. McMonagle, 689 F. Supp. 465 (E.D. Pa. 1988), aff'd in relevant part, 868 F.2d 1342 (3d Cir. 1989). The decision to grant a new trial lies within the discretion of the district court, althoug

hysician-patient or hospital-patient privilege." Allen v. Woodford 2007 WL 309485 *I I (E.D. Cal. 2007).

951) (emphasis supplied). "[A] witness has some minimal burden to justify invocation of the privilege." In re I.M.V.. Inc. 90 F.R. 737, 739 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988). The privilege must be asserted in response to a particular question, and in each instance "[i]t is for the court to decide whether a witness' sile

hysician-patient or hospital-patient privilege." Allen v. Woodford 2007 WL 309485 *I I (E.D. Cal. 2007).

951) (emphasis supplied). "[A] witness has some minimal burden to justify invocation of the privilege." In re I.M.V.. Inc. 90 F.R. 737, 739 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988). The privilege must be asserted in response to a particular question, and in each instance "[i]t is for the court to decide whether a witness' sile