Epstein Secrets

-A-Car, Inc., 632 So. 3d 1352 (Fla. 1994) 7, 9 Allen v. State Dep't of Health and Human Resources, 456

he act has some relation to the proceeding." Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla.1994); see also Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007). Fischer argues that his malicious prosecution lawsu

art of a confidential, attorney-directed investigation into Even one of the appellate decisions adopting Sporck involved a divided panel. See In re Allen, 106 F.3d 582 (4th Cir. 1997) (2-1 decision). EFTA00177849 possible illegal activity within and against [the corporate client]." a at 57. The inv

isclosure by the attorney-client privilege falls upon the party autillnilike privilege. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. . Deasoil, 632 So.2d 1377, 1383 I (Fla.1994); Cone I. Culverhouse, 687 So.2d 888, 892 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ('The privilege will not apply unless the party asserting it proves that the communic

Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicusi U.S. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Wait I. Florida Power & Light Co., 372 So.2d 420 (Fla.1979). MINER, ALLEN and KAHN, IL, concur. END OF DOCUMENT Copr. °West 1995 No claim to orig. U.S. govt. works Page 1 WESTLAW ye% EFTA00183731

abuse by teacher on minor pu- pil). Compare Freehold School Board of Seminole County, 623 So.2d 761 (Fla. 5th DCA)cause dismissed, 629 So.2d 132 (Fla.1994) (Suit for abuse inflicted on son by stepmother; failure to report suspected abuse by school); Fischer , Metcalf 543 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)