he act has some relation to the proceeding." Levin, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, P.A. v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 639 So. 2d 606, 608 (Fla.1994); see also Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 2007). Fischer argues that his malicious prosecution lawsu

use by teacher on minor pu- pil). Compare Freehauf I School Board of Seminole County, 623 So.2d 761 (Fla. 5th DCA)cause dismissed, 629 So.2d 132 (Fla.1994) (Suit for abuse inflicted on son by stepmother; failure to retort suspected abuse by school); Fischer 1 Metcalf 543 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)

isclosure by the attorney-client privilege falls upon the party autillnilike privilege. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. . Deasoil, 632 So.2d 1377, 1383 I (Fla.1994); Cone I. Culverhouse, 687 So.2d 888, 892 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ('The privilege will not apply unless the party asserting it proves that the communic

abuse by teacher on minor pu- pil). Compare Freehold School Board of Seminole County, 623 So.2d 761 (Fla. 5th DCA)cause dismissed, 629 So.2d 132 (Fla.1994) (Suit for abuse inflicted on son by stepmother; failure to report suspected abuse by school); Fischer , Metcalf 543 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)