Epstein Secrets

ulsa Mayor. EFTA00150232 The Washington Examiner (7/19, Mastrangelo, 448K) reports federal authorities announced Friday that Adam Maxwell Donn of Norfolk, Virginia "has been charged with making online threats to the mayor of Tulsa, Oklahoma, in an attempt to pressure him against allowing President Tr

t Judge Alison Nathan "said the jury's guilty verdict would be vacated, 'and has no legal effect,' in an order Friday. Earlier, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York had concluded that 'it would not be in the interests of justice to further prosecute this case." NPR adds, "The unusual saga featured the governmen

: 561-201-2072 (C); 561-547-2415 (11); 561-798-1747 VALLARO, (Garcia - married name) DOB: 7/1986 Age: 17 Address: 8500 Tidewater Drive, Apt 61, Norfolk, VA 23503 Phone: 757-493-3750 (H) D :02/08/1987 Age: 17 Address: 7351 East Speedway Blvd, #22D, Tuscon, AZ 85710 Phone: 561-436-2111 (C) DOB:

arez Re: Jeffrey Epstein Alvarez: NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Miss Alvarez: • By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida provides you with the following notice. On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea of guilt

L one: mo er ; stepfather) : A e: 17 Addr • West Palm Beach, FL 33411 Phone CO o lb CA— CPIA-VVLA- -^Wreta OtAity) co : e: 17 Address: Norfolk, VA 23503 Phone: : A e: 17 Address: ucson, AZ 85708 Phone: ( : A e: 17 Address: Phone: , Loxahatchee, FL 33470 arents) • (.. ‘ : A

E A Miami, Florida 33160 Re: Jeffrey Epstein NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Dear Mr. By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client, On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) enter

igation privilege. " Westmoreland v. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc., 752 F.2d 16, 23 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court for Norfolk Cty., 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982)). 49 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 572-73 (1980) (plurality opinion) (internal quotation mar

bears no possible relation to the controversy or may cause the objecting party prejudice."); Wine Markets Int'l, Inc. v. Bass, 177 F.R.D. 128,133 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) ("Motions to strike are not generally favored, except in relation to scandalous matters."); Alvarado-Morales v. Digital Equip. Corp., 843 F.2