Back to Network
11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
Document Mentions (11 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
h a circumstance-specific approach." Nijhawan v. Holder, 557 U.S. 29, 32, 38 (2009) (emphasis added). Thu
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (81)
Entities connected to both Eric Holder and the Higher Education Technical Amendments of
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON812 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON203 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
United States
LOCATION201 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION82 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION81 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON49 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Reid Weingarten
PERSON45 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON43 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION43 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
CO
Collins
PERSON35 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Adriana Ross
PERSON31 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON28 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
WE
Werner
PERSON26 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
WA
Walker
PERSON25 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
SC
Schneider
PERSON25 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Dodge
ORGANIZATION25 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Giglio
PERSON24 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
TH
Thompson
PERSON23 w/ Eric·11 w/ the
Leahy
PERSON22 w/ Eric·11 w/ the