Back to People & Entities
the Higher Education Technical Amendments of
Organization
11
Total Mentions
11
Documents
82
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
Document Mentions (11)
EFTA00085225.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00085225
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00090494.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00090494
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00092755.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092755
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
EFTA00092886.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00092886
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00103273.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103273
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00103343.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103343
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
EFTA00103308.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103308
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00103238.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00103238
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00104652.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00104652
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
EFTA00105663.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00105663
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
EFTA00154640.pdf
1 mentionEFTA00154640
age twenty-five, applied to past conduct. See United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682, 684-85 (8th Cir. 2005). The Second Circuit has observed that the Higher Education Technical Amendments of 1991, Pub. L. No. 102-26, 105 Stat. 123, illustrates language that requires a statute's application to past conduct. See Enter. Mortg. Acceptance C
Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 82)
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
11 docs11 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
11 docs11 co-mentions
Adriana Ross
PersonPolish former model and Epstein associate, named as unindicted co-conspirator in 2007 plea deal, invoked Fifth Amendment in depositions
11 docs11 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
11 docs11 co-mentions
FBI
OrganizationFederal Bureau of Investigation, domestic intelligence and security service of the United States
11 docs11 co-mentions
Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015
11 docs11 co-mentions
Murray
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple Murrays including Murray J. McCabe and Murray Gell-Mann in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Brady
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Alberto Gonzales
Person80th United States Attorney General
11 docs11 co-mentions
Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
11 docs11 co-mentions
CO
Collins
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
SC
Schneider
PersonAmbiguous surname - refers to multiple people in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
WA
Walker
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
RU
Russo
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
TH
Thompson
PersonSurname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Leahy
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
JE
Jeffries
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents
11 docs11 co-mentions
Reid Weingarten
PersonAmerican white-collar criminal defense attorney at Steptoe & Johnson, represented Jeffrey Epstein and other high-profile clients
11 docs11 co-mentions
SA
Salameh
PersonLegal case citation: United States v. Salameh (misclassified as PERSON)
11 docs11 co-mentions
CU
Cunningham
PersonAmbiguous surname reference in Epstein documents
11 docs11 co-mentions