Epstein Secrets

32-7137 F isidrogarcia©bellsouth.net Counsel .for:Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 ' Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] kezell@podhurstcom Counsel for

of other alleged victims. As this Court knows, attached to the NPA is a list which delineates alleged victims. Once the NPA was made public, Judge Colbath, with the agreement of the Palm Beach Post, Brad Edwards, Esq. and Spencer Kuvin, Esq. agreed that the "list" would remain private. As such, Request

EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE

n For Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law [D.E. 65], and the recent ruling from Judge Colbath in the related state court cases, Plaintiffs believe that the issues raised in Defendant's Motion to Stay are moot. Dated: June 29, 2009. -4- Podh

ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff By: s/Robert C. J osefsberg Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Br No. 04085

t 169 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2009 Page 5 of 8 1. The issuemaybemademoot at a June 25, 2009, hearing before Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Colbath. 2. This motion is not made for the purpose of delay and should be granted in the interest of equity and fairness. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Jane Do

2-7137 F [email protected] Counselfor·Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- , 80469 • Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel fo

ch State Attorney and the USAO may not want to disclose their files for one reason or another. (ii) Third Party Privacy Rights And Judge Jeffrey's Colbath's Order The Magistrate's Order does not consider the privacy rights of other alleged victims. As this Court knows, attached to the NP A is a list w

ent. The grounds for this motion are as follows: Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800, Miami,

9, hearing before Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Colbath. 2. This motion is not made for the purpose of

561.832-7137 F isidrogarcia@bellsouthoet Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358.2382 riosefsbetaloodhurstcom Isegellgyodhurstcom Counsel for P

l Circuit-Palm Beach Palm Beach County Courthouse Main Judicial Complex 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 11F West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Dear Judge Colbath: Tampa 40D N. Maley Dr., Ste. 1100. Tampa. FL 33002 P.O. Box 2002. Tempe. FL 33801-2602 FP 813 90 3080 fax 813-984-3070 toll five 888-395.7100 F

m Beach, FL 33409 Counsel for Plaintiff, Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08- 80469 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Hagler Street, Suite 800 130 EFTA00182754 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 152 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/10/2009 Page 8 of 8 Do

tr Now York Clly 220 E. 42nd Sc. 10th Floor www.Oclawliny eme De Direct Dial:NOB Deanna.Shullmanf000lawerm.com Reply To Tampa Re: Dear Judge Colbath: Enclosed is a courtesy copy of non-party Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. d/b/a The Palm Beach Post's (the "Post") Motion to Intervene and Petition for

Willits, here on behalf of the plaintiff C.M.A.. 15 THE COURT: Good morning. 16 MS. EZELL: Good morning, Your Honor. I'm Katherine 17 Ezell from Podhurst Orseck, here with Amy Adderly and Susan 18 Bennett, and I believe my partner, Bob Josefsberg, is going to 19 appear by telephone. 20 THE COURT: Mr. Jose

ether or not I want to have it submitted to me in camera. (E.W.-13, page 42, lines 8-15(emphasis added).) All of petitioner's assertions that Judge Colbath's order under review here "violated" Judge Marra's orders, that the lower court gave only "lip service" to Judge Marra, that the supremacy clause a