Epstein Secrets

ponsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) and other federal government agencies with law enforcement responsibilities related to the Epstein case (such as the Internal Revenue Service). Thi

found on page 1 of the supplemental privilege log (DE 216-1), with t »lemental box No. 3 P-013282 to 1. fhe entry here reads: "7/08/08 email from A. Acosta, , and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." In responding to defense attorney Goldberger's letter about victim

ponsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) and other federal government agencies with law enforcement responsibilities related to the Epstein case (such as the Internal Revenue Service). Thi

of the supplemental privilege log (DE 216-1), with regard to supplemental box No. 3 (P-013282 to 83). The entry here reads: "7/08/08 email from to A. Acosta, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." The log then indicates that the Government is asserting attorney-cli

ponsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) and other federal government agencies with law enforcement responsibilities related to the Epstein case (such as the Internal Revenue Service). Thi

privilege log (DE 216-1), with regard to supplemental box No. 3 (P-013282 to 83). The entry here reads: "7/08/08 email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, Ki. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." The log then indicates that the Government is

not dispute that this contact only occurred after the signing of the NPA. Even more important, it is not disputed that this contact was: 1) made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") and not a "prosecutor for the Government," 2) that the FBI did not inform the victims of the NPA and certainly did not confer with the vict

1 of 14 SUPPLEMENTAL PRIVILEGE LOG Bates Range Description Privilege(s) Asserted Suppl. Box #3 P-013279 Tluu P-013280 8/15/08 Emails between A. Acosta and and re proposed correspondence to Jay Lefkowitz Attorney-Client Privilege Work Product Suppl. Box #3 P-013281 Handwritten note re Epstein

ponsibility, the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, the U.S. Attorney's Offices for the Southern District and Middle District of Florida, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation) and other federal government agencies with law enforcement responsibilities related to the Epstein case (such as the Internal Revenue Service). Thi

l privilege log (DE 216-1), with regard to supplemental box No. 3 (P-013282 to 83). The entry here reads: "7/08/08 email from A. Marie Villafafia to A. Acosta, J. Sloman, K. Atkinson, and FBI re proposed response to Goldberger's letter re victim notification." In responding to defense attorney Goldberger

e to support the case, Mr. Epstein would be charged appropriately.8 2. Describe in detail your role, and the role of each other person in the USAO, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and elsewhere within the Department of Justice — collectively herein "the government" — who was involved in the assessment of the viability

o jurisdiction. Response states that defense understands the concerns and will work to come up with a mutually acceptable solution. 49 9/13/2007 A. Acosta, J. Sloman, R. Garcia, K. Atkinson, A. Lourie A. Marie Villafafia Email re plea negotiations 46 9/13/2007 A. Lourie A. Marie Villafatia