Epstein Secrets

VERSIGHT_015533 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:15-cv-07433 Document1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 12 15. Rather than confer with the victims about the NPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office and Epstein agreed to a “confidentiality” provision in the Agreement barring its disclosure to anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a consequence,

e to anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a consequence, the victims were not told about the NPA. 16. On July 7, 2008, a young woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, one of Jeffrey Epstein’s victims (other than Giuffre), filed a petition to enforce her rights under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18

iminal proceeding is ever commenced is entirely within the Defendant’s control, by complying with the terms of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Defendant relies upon an amorphous Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 2 of 9 - 3 - possible br

filed an identical Motion to Stay in the case Jane Doe v. Epstein, case no. 08- CIV 80893 MARRA/JOHNSON. Plaintiffs concur in the arguments made by Jane Doe’s counsel in that case in opposition to Defendant’s Motion. (Case no. 08-CIV 80893, DE 31). The same reasoning and arguments apply in the instant ca

iminal proceeding is ever commenced is entirely within the Defendant’s control, by complying with the terms of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Defendant relies upon an amorphous Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 2 of 9 - 3 - possible br

filed an identical Motion to Stay in the case Jane Doe v. Epstein, case no. 08- CIV 80893 MARRA/JOHNSON. Plaintiffs concur in the arguments made by Jane Doe’s counsel in that case in opposition to Defendant’s Motion. (Case no. 08-CIV 80893, DE 31). The same reasoning and arguments apply in the instant ca

ot performing under the terms of the NPA. This tips the balance of equities even further in favor of the plaintiffs. Epstein makes allegations that the U.S. Attorney’s Office has unfettered discretion in determining breaches of the NPA, but this is no different than in any contractual setting. If one party believes that t

______________________/ C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. ____________________________________/ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

f the plaintiffs. Epstein makes allegations that the U.S. Attorney’s Office has unfettered discretion in determining breaches

Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff,

, 000-in: BANBEES Therefore, ‘the terms. of the NPA ad to pei Jane Doe from using the NPA to prove liability. . 5. - Epstein has filed an answer to. ‘Jane Doe’ s complaint, in witch he has invoked his Fifth Amendment right to silence with respect to the allegations that he molested. her asa child. Epstein ha

ons, . this tape: is the only: way that Jane Doe can: ‘put Epstein’ sown perceptions of what - a he has. done‘before the j jury and the only way that Jane. Doe’ can. put Epstein’ s.admissions and statement oe Msi amnnetatm op ef og ‘before, the jury.. As even: a quick: perusal of. the 1 more. ‘than 500 ent

rete evidence and information that Epstein had sexually molested at least 40 underage minor females, including J. Jane Doe and I also requested from the U.S. Attorney’s Office the information and evidence that they had collected regarding Epstein’s sexual abuse of his clients. However, the U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to

very day, often two or three times per day. Jd. 25, In light of all of the information of numerous crimes committed by Epstein, Edwards learned that the U.S. Attorney’s Office began preparing the filing of federal criminal charges against Epstein. For example, in addition to the witness tampering and money laundering charge

rds filed a civil suit against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, L.M. v. Epstein, (Exhibit “V”’). 47. Jane Doe’s federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than $50,000,000. Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord wit

ential in accordance with this Court’s Order. As the Court knows, Ms. Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking when she was a minor child. Indeed, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida has specifically recognized HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650 --- PAGE BREAK --- her as a “victim” of federal sex offens

J. EDWARDS, and CASE NO. CACE 15-000072 PAUL G. CASSELL, Plaintiffs. Vv, ALAN DERSHOWITZ. Defendant, - ORDER ON BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP AND JANE DOE NO, 3’s MOTIONS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS OR FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER This Cause comes belore the Court on November 2, 2015 upon Boies, Schiller & Flexner L1P’

ch effort was successful. See Correspondence from U.S. Attorney’s Office to Epstein (hereinafter “U.S. Attorney’s Correspo

ards filed a civil sot against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, LM. v. Epstein, (Exhibit “V”). 3 47. Jane Doe’s federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than $50,000,000. Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord wit

curity Palm Beach County facility. A copy of the NPA was filed under seal with the state court. On July 7, 2008, a victim, identified as “Jane Doe,” filed in federal court in the Southern District of Florida an emergency petition alleging that the government violated the Crime Victims’ Rights

dditional briefs regarding the appropriate remedies. After the court’s order, the Department recused the USAO from the CVRA litigation and assigned the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia to handle the case for the government. Among the remedies sought by the petitioners, and opposed by the gover