Epstein Secrets

ain here. 2 Q No additionalinformation regarding 3 Dr. Bard? 4 .A No. 5 Q And with respect to the next paragraph it 6 mentions a woman by the name of Johanna Sjoberg, 7 spelled S-J-O-B-E-R-G. Do you see that? 8 A I see it, yes. 9 Q Do you recall anything in particular with 10 respect to Ms. .Sjoberg? .11. ,A No. 1

, 6- 7 spelled S-J-O-B-E-R0Q. Do yo~ see that? 7 8 A I sec it, yes. ·8 9 Q Do you recall anything in paiticular with 9 10 respect to Ms. Sjoperg? 10 11 .A No. il 12 Q If we tumto page 7 4 for a m9ment, then; 12 13 are, ·at the bottom of the page, .last paragraph, foul' 1'3. 14 sepa

urt sentence would also mean that the federal government was not proceeding.” There is no evidence, however, that he verified this understanding with Sloman or Villafana, let alone the State Attorney. OPR found no indication that Acosta ever communicated, or directed Sloman or Villafana to communicate, hi

tojthe victims regarding the upcoming change of plea, but the Office decided dial victim notification could only come from a state investigator, and Jeff Sloman asked PBPD Cliief Reiter to assist.” On Saturday, June 28,2008, VillafanajemailedSloman to inform him tliat PBPD Cliief Reiter “is going to notify vi

ision to resolve the case through the NPA or in the negotiations leading to the agreement: former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and former AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafana. Each subject submitted written responses detailing their involvement in the federa

n the CVRA litigation; Outlook data collected to respond to production requests in that case; a set ofEpstein case documents maintained by Acosta and Sloman; computer files regarding the Epstein case collected by Sloman; Villafafia’s Outlook data; Acosta’s hard drive; and the permanently retained official

turn date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Johanna Sjoberg (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Chri

on. 2/27/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 18 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Thomas Rofrano (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Johanna Sjoberg (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Christina (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Palm Beach County Health Dept (return date 3/13/

Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS) From: Sloman. Jeff (USAFLS) Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:26 PM To: Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS); Acosta, Alex (USAFLS) Subject: Fw: Epstein Fyi Se

bpoena to Paul A. Lavery (return date 5/29/07) 59 5/22/2007 Andrew Cootie Gerald B. Lefcourt Letter requesting to meet with Matthew Menchel and Jeffrey Sloman and \ lc\ Acosta prior to an indictment being filed 28 5/22/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman; cc: A. Marie Villafalia Andrew Laurie Email

/2008 VilLiana letter to Capt. Sleeth, Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, mganling Epstein's work release application 85 6/9/2009 Vadatla Memorandum to Sloman, Senior, Garcia, awl Atkinson seeking permission to declare breach with attachments awl proposal breach letter 86 6/9/2009 Signed indictment packa

rnoon of July 2, calls were made to Ms. and as well as others. Finally, on September 18, 5 calls were made to 5 females within 6 minutes including Sjoberg and Brabon (each over 18). See Toll Records, Exhibit 9. These records reflect that no one associated with Mr. Epstein deliberately targeted known

2, 23, Exhibit 5A; and Tr. at 16-17, 18, E i 4. Specifically, there is no evidence that Mr. Epstein targeted mino hornom we d of age (e.g., Tory Joanna Sjoberg, an determine w o was avai a e an wished to come to Mr. Epstein's rest • enc . . . . ' de a massage. This fact is readily confirmed by the assi

do not fit within any proper construction of any of the federal criminal statutes under consideration. • 4 First Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey Sloman sought to preclude Mr. Epstein or his agents from communicating with the alleged "victims." See November 5, 2007 Letter from J. Sloman, Exhibit I. D

due to a procedure available under state law, and following the wave of recent lawsuits that have been filed against Mr. Epstein (ironically by Mr. Sloman's former law partner), we have been able to engage in discovery and take sworn statements from several of the alleged victims. These statements, wh