Epstein Secrets

turn date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Johanna Sjoberg (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Chri

on. 2/27/2007 Grand Jury Testimony of E. Nesbitt Kuyrkendall 18 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Thomas Rofrano (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Johanna Sjoberg (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Christina (return date 3/13/07) 3/2/2007 Subpoena to Palm Beach County Health Dept (return date 3/13/

al EFTA00225432 EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION TIMELINE Date To From Re: Exhibit # 5/18/2007 Matthew Menchel A. Marie Villafatia Email informing Menchel of intent to subpoena Roy Black's private investigator and steps taken to obtain DOJ authorization 26 5/21/2007 Matthew Menchel and Jeff Sloman

ding 18 U.S.C. S 2255 38 7/81/2007 Email from Marie ViKaiak toJeff Molnar], Man Menchel, and Andrew Lourie summarizing proposed plea terms as per Menchel recommendation 39 7/81/07- 8/3/07 7/31/2007.8/3/2007 Entails between Jeff Montan, Matt Moretti, Andrew Louric, and Marie VilLafaria regarding pl

have to register inapplicability of 18 USC 2422 to Epstein's conduct; and reiteration of 2255 concerns. Attachment: 7/6/07 Lefcourt letter Sloman, Menchel, Lourie, and Villafafia with attachments 12/17/2007 Jeff Sloman Marie Villafafia Email inquiring about case status and informing Sloman regarding

ain here. 2 Q No additionalinformation regarding 3 Dr. Bard? 4 .A No. 5 Q And with respect to the next paragraph it 6 mentions a woman by the name of Johanna Sjoberg, 7 spelled S-J-O-B-E-R-G. Do you see that? 8 A I see it, yes. 9 Q Do you recall anything in particular with 10 respect to Ms. .Sjoberg? .11. ,A No. 1

, 6- 7 spelled S-J-O-B-E-R0Q. Do yo~ see that? 7 8 A I sec it, yes. ·8 9 Q Do you recall anything in paiticular with 9 10 respect to Ms. Sjoperg? 10 11 .A No. il 12 Q If we tumto page 7 4 for a m9ment, then; 12 13 are, ·at the bottom of the page, .last paragraph, foul' 1'3. 14 sepa

e case through the NPA or in the negotiations leading to the agreement: former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and former AUSAs Jeffrey H. Sloman, Matthew I. Menchel, Andrew C. Lourie, and Ann Marie C. Villafana. Each subject submitted written responses detailing their involvement in the federal investigation of E

ttorneys to disenfranchise and silence the victims. It is unfortunate, and appears fundamentally unfair to the victims, that Acosta and Sloman (after Menchel and Lourie departed) took the unusual step of deciding to vet the USAO victim notification letters with the defense after the NPA was signed, but fai

the experience.feeling confused and believing she had been misled. OPR did not find evidence supporting a conclusion that Villafana, Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, or Lourie opted not to consult with the victims in order to protect Epstein or shield the NPA from public scrutiny. Although neither Sloman nor Acos

URN DATE BATES # OR EXHIBIT OLY-34 Johnanna Sjoberg billing statements, record of payments, appoin

) Tuesdays SUBPOENA CONTROL # SUBPOENAED PARTY RECORDS SOUGHT APPEARANCE DATE ON SUBPOENA ACTUAL RETURN DATE BATES # OR EXHIBIT OLY-34 Johnanna Sjoberg billing statements, record of payments, appointment books, treatment notes and correspondence 3/13/2007 OLY-35 M billing statements, record

ng activities, then I would like to see a copy of its document retention policy, so I have added that to the Attachment to the Subpoena. Third, Mr. Menchel's comment to you about potential money laundering charges related only to a resolution of the case. In other words, if the sex offense case is resol

Alexander Acosta United States Attorney By: A. Marie Marie Villafatia Assistant United States Attorney cc: Lilly Ann Sanchez (with enclosure) Matthew Menchel (with enclosure) EFTA00193133 United States District Court SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TO: • Custodian of Records Riley Kiraly Commercial Ce

s statements demonstrate that the opposite is true. First. the evidence shows that the many of the masseuses wet...at:en or over. including inhaling Sjoberg,. Julie Brabon, Vencro. M. and Christine I=. at the time they visited Mr. ISpstein's home. Also, there is substantial evidence. found in the sw

in a suite prison, with the option of eliminating incarceration upon successful completion of the term of supervised custody. among other terms. Mr. Menchel stated that "the federal interest will not he vindicated in the absence of a Iwo year term in state prison." See August 3.2007 letter. Such an arti

as of traditionally local concern. we urged your Office to contemplate whether a federal prOSCCUtiall Was appropriate. However, on August 3. 2007. Matthew Menchel rejected a proposed state plea which included that Mr. Epstein serve two years of supervised custody followed by two years of incarceration in a su