Epstein Secrets

NS Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 26.1, Intervenor/Appellants hereby certify that the following persons have an interest in the outcome of this case: 1. Marra, The Honorable Kenneth 2. Acosta, R. Alexander 3. Black, Roy 4. Cassell, Paul G. 5. Edwards, Bradley J. 6. Epstein, Jeffrey 7. Ferrer, Wifredo

. The prior civil discovery order relied upon by Judge Marra, DE188:3-4, resulted from the efforts of the civ

sey: N.J. R. Evid. 410; New Mexico: N.M. R. Evid. 410; North Carolina: N.C. R. Evid. 410; North Dakota: N.D. R. Evid. 410; Ohio: Ohio R. Evid. 410; Oklahoma: 12 Okl. Stat. Ann. §2410; Oregon: Or. Rev. Stat. § 135.435; Pennsylvania: Pa. R. Evid. 410; Rhode Island: R.I. R. Evid. 410; South Carolina: S.C. R

rental car. victim. A motion may be filed before Judge Marra on the issue of inappropriate contact with and h

island. knew of other gifts given to , including Secret lingerie, birthday flowers, and a rental car. victim. A motion may be filed before Judge Marra on the issue of inappropriate contact with and harassment of M. 3 EFTA00191647 The one recruit whom I have kept in the indictment is Z. She is

e of "manifest injustice". Rourke was admitted to bail in the amount of Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) in the Northern District of Oklahoma on July 30, 1984. The Bail Re- form Act of 1966 was then in effect. He was free on bail at the effective date of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, yet t

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED

t from asserting privilege against those whose interests it must protect, such as Indian tribes. See, e.g., Osage Nation and/or Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 244 (2005); Cobell v. Norton, 212 F.R.D. 24 (D.D.C. 2002). For instance, in Osage Nation, the Government argued agains

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs

t from asserting privilege against those whose interests it must protect, such as Indian tribes. See, e.g., Osage Nation and/or Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. United States, 66 Fed. Cl. 244 (2005); Cobell v. Norton, 212 F.R.D. 24 (D.D.C. 2002). For instance, in Osage Nation, the Government argued agains