Epstein Secrets

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

rnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 68 561 fax OL Flori No.: 169440 37 EFTA00726035 SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Go

ttlement Conference, or in the Alternative, Motion to Direct Parties back to Mediation, Doe v. Epstein, No. 9:08-CV-80893 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2010) (Marra, J.) (doc. #168) attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Notably, Epstein sought this settlement conference — and ultimately made his payments as a result

there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe's case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein simply chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

nd email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. Jack Scarola Searc Denne Scarol Barnhart & Shipley West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu Goldber er et al. West P

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

-cv-80736-KAM Document 291-15 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/21/2015 Page 40 of Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1604E8 Filed 04/08/11 Page 39 of 39 SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Go

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fe

itigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that

v-80736-KAM ,current 291-15 Entered on FLSD L_ Ket 01/21/2015 Page 40 of Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 16048 Filed 04/08/11 Page 39 of 39 SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. P.A. FOWLER WHITE ETJRNE'IT Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. A b Goldber er et al. Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices o

in Jane Doe No. 2. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80893-Marra/Johnson on January 5, 2011. (See D.E. 226) (Ex.

ckerman, Jr. Florida Bar No. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Easier Drive West Palm B Telephone: Facsimile: and Christopher E. Knight Florida Bar. No. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A. Espirito Santo Plaza, 14th floor 1395 Brickell Avenue Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: Facsimile:

cket 09/13/2010 Page 6 of 7 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON III. EPSTEIN IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CVRA

g. /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards SERVICE UST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. Lily Ann Sanchez, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach

cket 09/13/2010 Page 6 of 7 CASE NO: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON III. EPSTEIN IS NOT A PARTY TO THE CVRA

g. /s/ Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards SERVICE UST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. Lily Ann Sanchez, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETTIO. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach,

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal entirpitge that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing ever clients intended to pursue an appeal of that dismi

Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: 42 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013360 --- PAGE BREAK --- SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldbe

at there was some improper coercion involved in, for example, Jane Doe’s case, his remedy was to raise the matter before Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra who was presiding over the matter. Far from raising any such claim, Epstein sinisly chose to settle that case. He is therefore now barred by the doct

litigation. The RICO claim alleged that Epstein ran an expansive criminal enterprise that involved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the federal litigation, the legal team representing Edwards' clients intended to pursue an appeal of that d

lved and depended upon his plane travel. Although Judge Marra dismissed the RICO claim at some point in the fed

Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: 42 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010607 --- PAGE BREAK --- SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. 901 Phillips Point West 777 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Jack Alan Goldbe