Epstein Secrets

rcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-I)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respon

w her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Governm

rial; and 3. closure would be effective in protecting the rights of the accused, without being broader than necessary to accomplish this purpose. Miami Herald Publ'a Co. v. Lewis, 426 So. 2d 1, 6 (Fla. 1982). This test, as well as the standard announced in Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. 531 So. 2d 113 (F

utely 21 22 no contact could mew between he and 22 23 Mr. Horowitz and his client nor anyone else. 23 24 Until the court, until either Judge Marra or 24 25 Judge Johnson nded on the issue as to whether 25 Page 7 1 or not he could appear at the depositions of 2 not only Jane Doe 4 but an

yone else. 23 24 Until the court, until either Judge Marra or 24 25 Judge Johnson nded on the issue as to

records. See Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc., 531 So. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing to challenge any closure order); Miami Herald Publ'a Co. v. Lewis, 426 So. 2d I, 7 (Fla. 1982) (news media must be given an opportunity to be heard on question of closure). 09/12/2019 P CONFIDENTIAL Age

FFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON CAS

records. See Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers. Inc., 531 So. 2d 113, 118 (Fla. 1988) (news media have standing to challenge any closure order); Miami Herald Publ'a Co. v. Lewis 426 So. 2d I, 7 (Fla. 1982) (news media must be given an opportunity to be heard on question of closure). EFTA00182785 08/05/2009 10:01