Epstein Secrets

go first? 14 MS. SHULLMAN: Mr. Edwards. 15 THE COURT: Mr. Edwards. 16 MR. EDWARDS: Your Honor, inasmuch as 17 Mr. Epstein is relying on Judge Marra's 18 order to support the argument that the 19 nonprosecution agreement needs to remain 20 sealed, I'd like to address that if you are 21 inc

omity, your Honor, 4 this Court should defer to Judge Marra 5 because, A, he has already ruled on the 6 d

f of Mr. Epstein as well 18 as Barbara Compiani from the office of Jane 19 Walsh. 20 MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman of 21 Thomas, LoCicero and Bralow on behalf of 22 the Palm Beach Post. 23 MR. KUVIN: Spencer Kuvin on behalf 24 of the intervener BB. 25 MS. BURNS: Barbara Burns on behalf SU

ates, EFTA00183579 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ROY BLACK, ESQ. AUGUST 26, 2008 PAGE 2 OF 2 and he agrees that, based upon the discussion with Judge Marra during the hearing on the plaintiffs' motion, a notification of the judge's ruling is required. I will, however, change the language slightly to di

nd he agrees that, based upon the discussion with Judge Marra during the hearing on the plaintiffs' motion, a

0,13 9:23 10:1,4 10:6,21 11:5 12:17 12:19,21,25 13:14 15:18 beyond 12:24 bit 3:15 bite 13:3,7 Blvd 2:13 Brad 3:24 Bradley 2:11 3:11 Bralow 2:18 3:13 brought 6:2,3 burden 4:22 8:11 11:13 Burman 2:6 burning 11:24 13:24 C 2:4,7 3:5,5 character... 8:25 10:13 circuit 1:1,1 5:1

is 24 Court should defer to the rulings of 25 Judge Marra already. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COUR

e 22 and that in our mind is equally important 23 as the fact in the interest of comity this 24 Court should defer to the rulings of 25 Judge Marra already. SUSAN WIGGINS, R.P.R. AND OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER EFTA00231387 41 1 As to Mr. Kuvin's argument that he 2 has a client that is in sta

f of Mr. Epstein as well 18 as Barbara Compiani from the office of Jane 19 Walsh. 20 MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman of 21 Thomas, LoCicero and Bralow on behalf of 22 the Palm Beach Post. 23 MR. KUVIN: Spencer Kuvin on behalf 24 of the intervener ■. 25 MS. BURNS: Barbara Burns on behalf SUS

ssion not to comply 12 with U.S. District Court Judge Marra's 13 previous orders. 14 We respectfully subm

in the second to 10 last page, you said this order is no way to 11 be interpreted as permission not to comply 12 with U.S. District Court Judge Marra's 13 previous orders. 14 We respectfully submit that it would 15 not comply with Judge Marra's previously 16 issued orders. We also believe t

on behalf of Mr. Epstein as well 18 as Barbara Compiani from the office of Jane 19 Walsh. 20 MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman of 21 LoCicero and Bralow on behalf of 22 the Palm Beach Post. 23 MR. KUVIN: Spencer Kuvin on behalf 24 of the intervener III 25 MS. BURNS: Barbara Burns on behalf SU

aw enforcement have conducted investigations of The undersigned attorneys were given a copy of the NPA through the federal proceedings before Judge Marra (see E.W.'s response to the petition filed herewith), but, inexplicably, undersigned was not provided a copy of the Addendum. We have never seen it

f the NPA through the federal proceedings before Judge Marra (see E.W.'s response to the petition filed herew

alancing 8: 1 Beach apply 3:13 1:2 20 21 25 13:14 15:18 beyond 12:24 bit 3:15 bite 13:3,7 Blvd 2:13 Brad 3:24 Bradley 2:11 3:11 Bralow 2:18 3:13 brought 6:2,3 burden 4:22 8:11 11:13 Burman 2:6 burning 11:24 13:24 C 2:4,7 3:5,5 3:1 16:1,1 9:19 10:8,9 clear 11:7 client