Epstein Secrets

onfidentiality clause, precluding it from EFTA00232246 being disclosed to third parties or made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to third parties. 3. Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Deborah Pucillo ordered Mr. Epstein's attorney

he court. (A-16:2; A-18:43). The court ruled that "[t]his Order is in no way to be interpreted as permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous a d‘rs." (A-16.3). Subsulticnt to this oral ruling, M. Epstein provided the court with a Motion for Stay (A-14). The court stayed disclosu

py of that acknowledgment to the USAO. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 21" day of August, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: all counsel of record By signing below, 1 certify that I have reviewed and agree to be bound by

made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at '3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (ED.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its

onfidentiality clause, precluding it from EFTA00231126 being disclosed to third parties or made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to third parties. 3. Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Judge Deborah Pucillo ordered Mr. Epstein's attorney

; A-18:43). The court ruled that "[t]his Order is in no way to be interpreted as 6 EFTA00231138 permission to not comply with U.S. District Court Kenneth Marra's previous Orders." (A-16:3). Subsequent to this oral ruling, Mr. Epstein provided the court with a Motion to Stay (A-14). The court stayed disclosur

made part of any public record. Federal District Judge Marra has twice ordered the documents not disclosed to

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at •3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (ED.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CERTIFICATION OF EMERGENCY FILPFAike

by 5:00 P.M. on Wednesday, July 9, 2008. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 7th day of July, 2008. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies furnished to: R. Alexander Acosta, United States' Attorney all counsel of record EFTA00177719 UNITED STATE

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but it

tioner's Emergency Petition for Enforcement of Crime Victim's Rights Act on Friday, July 11, 2008 at 10:15 A.M. before United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra, 701 Clematis Street, Courtroom 4, West Palm Beach, Florida. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this /0

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner. ORDER TA

VRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States!. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States" Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its

F FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the discovery process." Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The Committee Notes state, in relevant part, as follows: Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the

F FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defen

not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the discovery process." Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The 3 EFTA00222173 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 94 Entered on FLSD Docket 05;06/2009 Page 4 of 10 Committee Notes state, in releva

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States'. Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States.. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 08-80736-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: IN RE: JANE DOE, Petitioner.

RA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States v. Pallor, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States v. Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319,335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its

A. Marie Villafafla Assisi ant 696 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB-001854 EFTA00185052 Case 9:08-cv-8073

CVRA itself suggests this conclusion by requiring that courts must treat crime victims with "fairness." United States' Patkar, 2008 WL 233062 at *3 (D. Haw. 2008) (citing United States' Turner, 367 F.Supp.2d 319, 335 (E.D.N.Y. 2005)). Not only must the CVRA as a whole be interpreted liberally, but its