Epstein Secrets

as signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10,

of the agents and myself the matter was, in fact, "currently under investigation." The NPA was signed on September 24, 2007. The letters that Judge Marra referred to in his order were dated January 10, 2008 and May 30, 2008. During the period that the letters were sent, Epstein was asserting that: (a

he West Palm Beach Office and is now the liaison to the Greater Palm Beach County Health Care Fraud Task Force. Since returning to West Palm Beach, AUSA Villafafia's caseload has shifted more towards economic crimes, but she has worked on a wide array of cases including insurance fraud, varying types of health c

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7t° meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments

: I write to confirm my conversation with Mr. Lefkowitz of June 12, 2009. As I mentioned during that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state court and

ing that conversation and during the hearing with Judge Marra, the U.S. Attorney's Office is not a party to an

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7t° meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the ar ems r

NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the E

ration are AUSA Villafaila's letters to the victim's counsel, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. DE 14. Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I. is copied on AUSA Villafafia's letters and Special Agent Richards and Kuyrkendall are referenced in certain letters to Mr. Edwards. DE 14. Moreover, Epstein's counsel, Jack Goldb

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. U

would impeach the victims and my credibility by asserting that I told victims they could receive money for implicating Epstein." Id. The basis for AUSA Villafafia's decision was offered to demonstrate that it was the 2 EFTA00601683 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 3 o

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, vs. U

would impeach the victims and my credibility by asserting that I told victims they could receive money for implicating Epstein." Id. The basis for AUSA Villafafia's decision was offered to demonstrate that it was the 2 EFTA00799965 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 421 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/25/2017 Page 3 o

vernment, and openings are set 2724 08-80736-CV-MARRA REP WPB-002020 EFTA00184828 Case 9:08-cv-8073

a plea resolution. The inclusion of a Section 2255 remedy was specifically raised and discussed at the September 7th meeting. Indeed, according to AUSA Villafafia's notes, you thanked her for bringing it to your attention. Again, no objection to the Section 2255 issue was raised. After considering the arguments