Epstein Secrets

th the whole group. It seems that there were two points that were left hanging that were not completely answered during the argument. One was Judge Marra's repeated questions about "how would this really impact the government's discretion," alternatively phrased as, "couldn't you just have picked up t

completely answered during the argument. One was Judge Marra's repeated questions about "how would this really

0 S. Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-209-1047 Fax 561-802-1787 From: Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 9:39 AM To: Ferrer, Wifredo A. (USAFLS);. , ( I" - -), tl - • ' ( ti - -1, ti .„ I r 1' — -) Cc: Subject: RE: Jane Does 1 and 2 United States - Hearing on Friday, August 12

ith the victims prior to the execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. An emergency hearing was held on July 11, 2008, before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Since Epstein had entered his EFTA00206256 state court plea and been sentenced already, the court found there was no emergency. He directed the

s 1 and 2 v. United States Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA (S.D.Fla.). We are seeking your advice and guidan

they seek is a set aside by the court of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and a prosecution of Epstein. On December 10, 2010, United States Attorney Wifredo A. and I, met with Cassell, Edwards, and S one of the victims. We discussed the posture of the case, and told us her views of what occurred and her

July 11, 2008 10:15 a.m. The above entitled matter came on for Emergency Petitioner for Enforcement of Crime Victim Rights before the Honorable Kenneth A. Marra, pursuant to Notice, taken before Victoria Aiello, Court Reporter, pages 1-32. For the Plaintiff: Bradley Edwards, Esquire For the Defendant: Dex

, please don't hesitate to call. 6 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB 001709 EFTA00184703 Case 9:08-cv-8073

te to undisputed facts — no such stipulation would be forthcoming. Ins on March 15, 2011, the U.S. Attorney for the th Souern District of Florida, Wifredo A. sent a letter to the victims declining to reach any agreement on the facts: Because, as a matter of law, the CVRA is inapplicable to this matter i

legal restriction or sanction. 909 08-80736-CV-MARRA RFP WPB-001894 EFTA00184955 Case 9:08-cv-8073

to undisputed facts — no such stipulation would be forthcoming. Instead, on March 15, 2011, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Wifredo A. , sent a letter to the victims declining to reach any agreement on the facts: Because, as a matter of law, the CVRA is inapplicable to this matter

ssistant General Counsel 1 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013260 EFTA00229679 Executive Office for Un

From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 3:32 PM Ferrer, Wifredo A. (USARS); O'Neill, Robert (USAFLM); (USAFLM) David (ODAG) (JMD); (USARS); FORMAL NOTICE of Office-wide Recusal of Southern District of Florida (GC