Epstein Secrets

< > wrote: I assume this e-mail was forwarded to me by mistake. I would appreciate being taken off the list of recipients of these communications. Kenneth A. Marra From: Paul Cassell To: . (USAFLS Cc: (USAFLS)" , "Brad Edwards r < Date: 07/01/2013 02:21 PM Subject: RE:MTD in the Eleventh Circuit Hi

13 18:51:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear Judge Marra - I apologize for including you on the last email

Jul 2013 18:51:26 +0000 Importance: Normal Dear Judge Marra - I apologize for including you on the last email

To: Cc: rS); Brad Edwards ( ); Paul Cassell Subject: Proposed Order, Jane Does I. United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so mu

2008) 07/16/2008 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against Defendant. Show Cause Response due by 7/28/2008. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 7/16/08. (ir) (Entered: 07/16/2008) EFTA00222622 Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Document 17 Entered on FLSD Docket 07:1672008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED ST

outhern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Internal Use Only Doe No. 3'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Case: 9:08-cv-80119—KAM Cause: 28:1332 Diversity—Personal Injury Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Date Filed: 03/05/2008 Jury Dem

T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY

a timely manner within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's report within the time allotted by the Local Rules. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in an entry of default against Defendant. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beac

ing for more than 90 days, triggering a 90 day report obligation under the local rules. We would trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. EFTA00204918 2. When we finished our telephone call with you some weeks back, Brad and I understood that we would be receiving (a) some initial

uld trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. EFTA00204918 2. When we finished our telepho

d fully briefed" and none is a "motion or other matter as to which the Court has conducted a hearing." In any event, after the recent amendments to the Local Rules, the 90-day notices are only "serve[dj on all parties and any affected non- parties." Court filing of the 90-day notices is no longer contemplated by

ing for more than 90 days, triggering a 90 day report obligation under the local rules. We would trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you some weeks back, Brad and I understood that we would be receiving (a) some initial discovery in th

uld trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you

d fully briefed" and none is a "motion or other matter as to which the Court has conducted a hearing." In any event, after the recent amendments to the Local Rules, the 90-day notices are only "serve[d] on all parties and any affected non- parties." Court filing of the 90-day notices is no longer contemplated by

ing for more than 90 days, triggering a 90 day report obligation under the local rules. We would trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you some weeks back, Brad and I understood that we would be receiving (a) some initial discovery in th

uld trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you

nd fully briefed" and none is a "motion or other matter as to which the Court has conducted a hearing." In any event, after the recent amendments to the Local Rules, the 90-day notices are only "serve[d] on all parties and any affected non-parties." Court filing of the 90-day notices is no longer contemplated b

what Epstein said certainly can't be regarded as privileged. And the e- mails regarding the NPA are clearly within the scope of discovery that Judge Marra envisioned. So please just give us the e-mails regarding the NPA. (2) Also, can you at least agree to make your initial disclosures under Rule 26

PA are clearly within the scope of discovery that Judge Marra envisioned. So please just give us the e-mails r

nd fully briefed" and none is a "motion or other matter as to which the Court has conducted a hearing." In any event, after the recent amendments to the Local Rules, the 90-day notices are only "serve[d] on all parties and any affected non-parties." Court filing of the 90-day notices is no longer contemplated b

the U.S. Attorney's Office regarding the non-prosecution agreement. Our understanding regarding the status of the current litigation is that Judge Marra currently has motions pending before him addressing: (1) whether you can use the emails that you have already received from other civil cases in thi

ing the status of the current litigation is that Judge Marra currently has motions pending before him addressi

nd fully briefed" and none is a "motion or other matter as to which the Court has conducted a hearing." In any event, after the recent amendments to the Local Rules, the 90-day notices are only "serve[d] on all parties and any affected non-parties." Court filing of the 90-day notices is no longer contemplated b

nce: Normal I assume this e-mail was forwarded to me by mistake. I would appreciate being taken off the list of recipients of these communications. Kenneth A. Marra From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> uate: UM-T/26n 02:21 PM Subject: RE:MTO in the Eleventh Circuit Brad and I are preparing to file to

f recipients of these communications. Kenneth A. Marra From: Paul Cassell <[email protected]> uat

rad Edwards ([email protected]); Paul Cassell u : rropasea order,.Jane Does United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so mu

tion is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in chambers this day of , 2007, at West Palm Beach, Florida. cc: AUSA Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE West Palm Beach EFTA00179097 (Rev. 06/2005)Seakd Document Tracking Form UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern Dis

Roy Black, Esq. William Richey, Esq. KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE West Palm Beach E

without being forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investigation and the matters occurring before the grand jury to Epstein. Pursuant to the Local Rules, the undersigned has conferred with counsel for Intervenor Epstein, who has advised that he opposes the granting of this motion. WHEREFORE, the Uni

Order, Jane Does I United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, att

dwards ([email protected]); Paul Cassell Subject: Proposed Order, Jane Does I United States, 08-80736-Civ-Marra Good afternoon. Pursuant to the Local Rules, attached please find a copy of the proposed order on the United States' unopposed motion for extension of time, in MS Word format. Thank you so mu