Epstein Secrets

: (USAFLS); (USAFLS) Subject: Jane Does US - Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Hi and — Here is the sealed portion of their response. Judge Marra's clerk called to confirm that we had no objection to the Motion to Seal. I stated that we had no objection. I am on vacation next week. We really

— Here is the sealed portion of their response. Judge Marra's clerk called to confirm that we had no objecti

From: (USAFLS)" ctl To: " (USAFI Elarlin> (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Jane Does I US -- Sealed Response to Motion to Dismiss Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 20:54:57 +0000 I mportance: Normal

ing for more than 90 days, triggering a 90 day report obligation under the local rules. We would trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with you some weeks back, Brad and I understood that we would be receiving (a) some initial discovery in t

uld trust you would be willing to file that with Judge Marra. 2. When we finished our telephone call with yo

From: Paul Cassell <I To: :=rUSAFLS" , Brad Edwards Cc: " USAFI gallt >, (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: Replies and Responses Due on January 6, 2012 Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 15:40:56 +0000 Importance: Normal Hey As you

«epstein addendum 10 30 pdf» 2654 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-014255 EFTA00189170 The information contain

or anything related to discovery. But please let me know if that is an incorrect assumption. Thanks - Jay Original Message From: "Sloman, Jeff (USAFI,S)" [email protected] Sent: 10'30)2007 02:42 PM AST To: Jay Lefkowitz Cc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" <Alex,AcostaQusdoLgov> Subject: Epstein Ja