Epstein Secrets

this time will be harmful to the Justice Department's on-going inquiry into Reinhard's conduct, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subject of a Justice Department inquiry and that further release of information would be harmful at thi

t, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subj

to intervene in our Crime Victims' Rights Act case. (Since has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail). As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example) Reinhard improperly represented in violation of Justice Department

Justice Department regulations. In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department's inquiry into Reinhard's conduct. We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support the allegations in our summary judgment motion.

this time will be harmful to the Justice Department's on-going inquiry into Reinhard's conduct, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subject of a Justice Department inquiry and that further release of information would be harmful at thi

t, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subj

intervene in our Crime Victims' Rights Act case. (Since Ruth has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail). As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example) Reinhard improperly represented in violation of Justice Department

Justice Department regulations. In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department's inquiry into Reinhard's conduct. We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support the allegations in our summary judgment motion.

this time will be harmful to the Justice Department's on-going Inquiry Into Reinhard's conduct, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subject of a Justice> Department inquiry and that further release of information would be harmful at th

t, we request that the Justice Department inform Judge Marra that the Reinhard situation is currently the subj

intervene In our Crime Victims' Rights Act case. (Since Ruth has not been served, I attach a copy of the pleading to this e-mail). As you will see, Reinhard claims that we have no factual basis for making an assertion that (for example) Reinhard Improperly represented In violation of Justice Department

Justice Department regulations. In view of this motion, we are writing to inquire into the current status of the Justice Department's inquiry into Reinhard's conduct. We also believe that the Justice Department has access to information that will support the allegations in our summary judgment motion.

ng the information that you have in that regard voluntarily, as opposed to us having to conduct formal discovery to get it. As you also know, Judge Marra has recently ordered discovery to proceed in this case. We obviously would like for that process to go as smoothly as possible and want to avoid be

E DOE, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, JUNE 12, 2009 7 VS. 8 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 9 Defendant. 10 11 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 15 18205 Biscayne Bou

ct formal discovery to get it. As you also know, Judge Marra has recently ordered discovery to proceed in this

icantly limited — representing numerous people at Epstein's behalf raises serious questions. At the very least, there is the strong appearance that Reinhard may have attempted to curry favor with Epstein and then reap his reward through favorable employment. At the very worst, there may have been advance

ith the victims prior to the execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. An emergency hearing was held on July 11, 2008, before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Since Epstein had entered his state court plea and been sentenced already, the court found there was no emergency. He directed the parties to meet

s 1 and 2'. United States, Case No. 08.80736-CIV-MARRA (S.D.Fla.), in light of a request by Paul Cassell

icantly limited — representing numerous people at Epstein's behalf raises serious questions. At the very feast, there is the strong appearance that Reinhard may have attempted to curry favor with Epstein and then reap his reward through favorable employment. At the very worst, there may have been advance

ith the victims prior to the execution of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. An emergency hearing was held on July 11, 2008, before U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra. Since Epstein had entered his state court plea and been sentenced already, the court found there was no emergency. He directed the parties to meet

e Victims Rights Litigation Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013272 EFTA00229691 Peter- Please see duty

icantly limited — representing numerous people at Epstein's behalf raises serious questions. At the very feast, there is the strong appearance that Reinhard may have attempted to curry favor with Epstein and then reap his reward through favorable employment. At the very worst, there may have been advance

ter Ruth — How do these look? Lisa 08-80736-C1V-MARRA P-013945 EFTA00230463

Griffin, Lisa (OPR) From: (OPR) Sent: May 04, 2011 5:01 PM To: (OPR) Subject: : rat tters In Epstein matter Let me think on it. He mentioned Reinhard in his first letter, right? As one of the "proofs" of improper influence? From: (OPR) Sent Wednesd May 04, 20114:57 PM To: (OPR) Subject draft

told him we were going to close.) 1 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013946 EFTA00230464 EFTA00230465

t — he understand that OPR does not get involved in litigation and will handle Cassell's requests. He told us that AU and the case agent say that Reinhard was present for a meeting in which the culpability of In= was discussed. =i is the person he later represented after retiring. However, even if tr