Epstein Secrets

mpiani & Vargas, P.A. (appellate counsel for petitioner) Spencer T. Kuvin of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. (counsel for non-party intervener,..) Honorable Kenneth A. Marra (judge, Southern District of Florida) Palm Beach Newspapers d/b/a The Palm Beach Post (non-party intervener) Deanna K. Shullman of Thomas, Locic

rcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-1)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respon

w her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Governm

the litigation, or to harass or maliciously injure another; or d. as asserting material factual statements that are false. Id. at 491. A copy of Administrative Order 2.303 is attached at Tab 2 to the Post's Supplemental Appendix, which was filed with its response brief. 3 EFTA00184006 07/20/2009 15:23 FAX US

rcement of Crime Victim's Rights Acts (A-I)." The victim also asked the federal court to allow her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Government had argued (A-4) — that the NPA was not a record of the federal court. (A-6) ("First, as respon

ORIDA JANE DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, I JUNE 12, 2009 vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, I Defendant. 11 TRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE KENNETH A. MARRA, 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE APPEARANCES: 13 14 FOR THE PLAINTIFFS: ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ. Mermelstein & Horowitz 15 16 For Jane Doe

w her to share the NPA with third parties (A-3). Judge Marra denied the motion, finding — as the U.S. Governm

the litigation, or to harass or maliciously injure another; or d. as asserting material factual statements that are false. Id, at 491. A copy of Administrative Order 2.303 is attached at Tab 2 to the Post's Supplemental Appendix, which was filed with its response brief. 3 EFTA00233653 07/20/2009 15:23 FAX 581

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

ptember 8, 2010, the Court issued an Administrative Order Closing the Case. (DE 38.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioners filed a "Notice in Response to Administrative Order," (DE39,) stating that they intended to file documents soon thereafter in connection with the case. On October 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order t

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioner

ptember 8, 2010, the Court issued an Administrative Order Closing the Case. (DE 38.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioners filed a "Notice in Response to Administrative Order," (DE39,) stating that they intended to file documents soon thereafter in connection with the case. On October 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order t

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I. UNITED S

ptember 8, 2010, the Court issued an Administrative Order Closing the Case. (DE 38.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioners filed a "Notice in Response to Administrative Order," (DE39,) stating that they intended to file documents soon thereafter in connection with the case. On October 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order t