Epstein Secrets

ates, EFTA00183579 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. ROY BLACK, ESQ. AUGUST 26, 2008 PAGE 2 OF 2 and he agrees that, based upon the discussion with Judge Marra during the hearing on the plaintiffs' motion, a notification of the judge's ruling is required. I will, however, change the language slightly to di

nd he agrees that, based upon the discussion with Judge Marra during the hearing on the plaintiffs' motion, a

they're not entitled to seal then I'll order it as dcGunanta unsealed. but that's kind of procedurally where I think the case So. I will allow Nz. Borger and 14. Skuilmen to argue if they wish to, otherwise I will go over to Mx. Goldberger and Mi. Critt911 to perhaps talk about whet they think about m

LNAN: Deanna Shullnan THE COURT: S-H-U-L -- KS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-X-A-N THE COURT: Me. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Berger, good morning. And Mr. Borger, your client is E -- NR. BERGER: ., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? Nit. EDWARDS: Bred Edwards on behalf of as well, Judge. Thanks, EFTA0018

aw enforcement have conducted investigations of The undersigned attorneys were given a copy of the NPA through the federal proceedings before Judge Marra (see E.W.'s response to the petition filed herewith), but, inexplicably, undersigned was not provided a copy of the Addendum. We have never seen it

f the NPA through the federal proceedings before Judge Marra (see E.W.'s response to the petition filed herew

lf of The Post is? MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman. THE COURT: S-H-V-L -- MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-K-A-N. THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edward■ on behalf of E.N

of The Post is? MS. RIPUIJ.MN: Deanna Shullman. THE COURT: S-H-U- I.. - MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-M-A-N. THE COURT: Ma. Shullman, good morning. Hr. Borger, good morning And Mr. Berger, your client is B - M. StRGE.P. L.N.. yOO THE COURT: Anybody tie. here? MR ESPORng: Brad Edwards on behalf of B.W. a

Rothstein's scheme went so far as to manufacture false and fraudulent Court opinions/orders including forging the signatures of U.S. District Judge, Kenneth A. Marra and U.S. Circuit Court Judge, Susan H. Black, 11th Circuit in other cases. It is not yet known if he forged similar documents in Esptein related mat

This matter is pending before the Honorable United States District Court Judge, Kenneth Marra. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. 5. _ As set forth in the Orders,

ra. 4. On March 25, 2009 and on April 23, 2009, Judge Marra entered detailed orders in this matter, copies o

scheme. EFTA00223282 Epstein 1RRA, et al. Page S6 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Borger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which

00798365 2 3 4 f 7 4 a 10 11 12 13 13 17 IS 20 21 22 23 24 25 117 transfer of a➢aota by Mr. Epstein that waa filed with Judge Marra? A No. I never hoard of that. Q Did you review the order entered by Judge Marra where he found that there wa➢ no evidence to support the filing

fer of a➢aota by Mr. Epstein that waa filed with Judge Marra? A No. I never hoard of that. Q Did you revie

on't have 25 scheme. And there wan even one or two 31 any further questions. 21 clients that More part of the Ponsi scheme. 32 MR. LINK: Mr. Borger, before we start 22 But maybe. being -- playing on 33 [roes-examination, do you want to take a 23 nocantics. I just don't consider it to be