Epstein Secrets

ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. Winn LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

hiring of investigators and, assuming certain parameters are met, also protect the information obtained thereby as work-product. See Alachua Gen'l Hosp.. Inc. v. Zimmer USA. Inc. 403 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 1s' DCA 1981) In re Faro Technologies Securities Litigation 2008 WL 205318 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Fed. R. Civ.

NE AND ORDERED this Au9uat 15, 2009, in Chambers, at West Palm Beach, Florida. LINNEA R. JO ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record their claim that Epstein's investigators were acting in ways which were harassing, humiliating to Plaintiffs and/or otherwis

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFRE

hiring of investigators and, assuming certain parameters are met, also protect the information obtained thereby as work-product. See Alachua Gen'l Hosp.. Inc. v. Zimmer USA. Inc. 403 So.2d 1087 (Fla. 15' DCA 1981). In re Faro Technologies Securities Litigation 2008 WL 205318 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Fed. R. Civ.

inder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All counsel of record 10 EFTA_R1_00012695 EFTA01734475

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, De

O statement are accepted as true, the alleged "enterprise" would clearly not act independently of Epstein, the RICO Defendant. See Boca Raton Comm. Hosp.. Inc. v. Tenet Healthcare Corp., 502 F.Supp.2d 1237, 1253 (S.D. Fla.2007) (the key to "distinctiveness" depends less on whether the enterprise members ar

inder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All counsel of record 10 EFTA_R1_02213303 EFTA02725760

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, De

O statement are accepted as true, the alleged "enterprise" would clearly not act independently of Epstein, the RICO Defendant. See Boca Raton Comm. Hosp.. Inc. v. Tenet Healthcare Corp., 502 F.Supp.2d 1237, 1253 (S.D. Fla.2007) (the key to "distinctiveness" depends less on whether the enterprise members ar