Epstein Secrets

f Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3id day of March, 2010. te r "- KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All counsel of record 10 EFTA00728583

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, De

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 (1981); Gross v. State, 765 So.2d 39, 43 (Fla. 2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RICO law). "The distinction betwe

inder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All counsel of record 10 EFTA_R1_00012695 EFTA01734475

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, De

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 (1981); Gross v. State, 765 So.2d 39, 43 (Fla. 2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RICO law). "The distinction betwe

inder of Defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 3s day of March, 2010. / KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge copies to: All counsel of record 10 EFTA_R1_02213303 EFTA02725760

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80893-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, De

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576, 583 (1981); Gross v. State, 765 So.2d 39, 43 (Fla. 2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RICO law). "The distinction betwe

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

ourt have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turkette, 452 U.S. 576. 583. 101 S.Ct. 2524. 69 L.Ed.2d 246 (1981); Gross v. State. 765 So.2d 39. 43 (Fla.2000) (adopting Turkette as a matter of Florida RI