Epstein Secrets

09/23/2008 a ORDER denying as moot 31 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 9 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/23/08. (ir) (Entered: 09/23/2008) 09/25/2008 39 SCHEDULING REPORT- Rule 26(O. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/25/2008) https://ecf.flsd.uscou

e No. 3 v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 2:flasaAhd Member case: (View Member

as a factual allegation"). Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, see 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller) C[T]he pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement o

oe No. 5'. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Lead case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Member case: (View

09/23/2008 42 ORDER denying as moot 4.5 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 12 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/23/08. (ir) (Entered: 09/23/2008) 09/25/2008 51). SCHEDULING REPORT- Rule 26(1). (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: 09/25/2008) 09/30/2008 51. SCH

s a factual allegation"). Factual allegations st be enough to raise a right to relief If above the speculative level, see 5 . Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1216, pp. 235-236 d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller) ("[T]he pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement o

t of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, dete

lleged perpetrator. Alleged perpetrator intervened. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, Kenneth A. Marra, Senior District Judge, 359 F.Supp.3d 1201, determined that government had violated CVRA, but after alleged perpetrator's death, alleged victim's

r, as the CVRA requires, she filed a petition for writ of mandamus. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3): see also 16 Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3932 (3d ed. 2019) (explaining that a mandamus petition is "an original application to the court of appeals"). The question before

it is set at 36 pages. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 6/9/2009. (ir) (Entered: 06/10/2009) 06/10/2

behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Redocketed SEE Image 19 (ail) (Entered: 08/28/2008) 09/03/2008 21 r ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Kenneth A. Marra for all further proceedings. Judge William J. Zloch no longer https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/egi-bin/D1ctRpt.p11/985369616841682-L_801_0-1 6/10/2009

s a factual allegation"). Factual allegations 11211st be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, see 51. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure 4 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller) ("[T]he pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement

AM Doe v. Epstein Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra Referred to: Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johnson

:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra. Calendar Call set for 1/22/2010 10:00 AM in West Palm Beach Division before Judge Kenneth A. Marra., Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2008. Discovery due by 8/3/2009. Motions due by 8/31/2009. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Linnea R. Johns

d as a factual allegation"). Factual allegations naist be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, see 5 Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and EFTA00175635 Case 9:08-cv-i„ .19-KAM Docuri, 146 Enterer, ...i FLSD Docket 10i„,2008 Page 4 of 10 Case No. CV-80119-Marra-Johnson Page No

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON C.M. A., Plaintiff, v. EPSTEIN and D

as a factual allegation"). Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, see 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure 4 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller) ("[T]he pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement

THERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 013-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 I UNITED S

`satellite litigation"' that will frustrate the rule's goal of 'more effective operation of the pleading regimen.' Id. (citing 5A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1332, at 29 (1990)). motion is also untimely. On March 20, 2011, the victims filed their motion for summary judgment — the pleading

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED

" `satellite litigation' that will frustrate the rule's goal of `more effective operation of the pleading regimen.' Id. (citing 5A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1332, at 29 (1990)). Reinhart's motion is also untimely. On March 20, 2011, the victims filed their motion for summary judgment — t

OF FLORIDA JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893 - MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

as a factual allegation"). Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level, see 5 C. Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter Wright & Miller) ("Mlle pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement o

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE I and JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

ax Labs., Inc. . Twin Laboratories Inc., 183 F. .D. 458, 463, n. 8 (D.Md.1998); 8 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Richard L. Marcus, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 2d § 2023 at 335 (2d ed.1994)(work product materi- als are not beyond the scope of dis- covery on grounds of "privilege"). FN