Epstein Secrets

mine how this case will proceed. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 28ih day of October, 2010. /ern KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of record EFTA00724495

OUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-OV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 and #2, Petitioners, vs.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, action. this 8ih day of October, 2010. Copies to: Counsel of record en KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge 2 EFTA00724484 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/27/2010 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DIST

INSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution. (DE 41). On September 8, 2010, the Court entered an Order administratively closing this case in light of related

determine how this case will proceed. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 28th day of October, 2010. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of record EFTA00235189

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs.

HNSON JANE DOES #1 AND #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution. (DE 41). On September 8, 2010, the Court entered an Order administratively closing this case in light of related

Ms. Villafana submitted an amicus curae brief to Judge Marra stating in her own words that the protections Mr

ses while the USAO's obligations under the NPA not to prosecute Epstein still remained open, Ms. Villafana submitted an amicus curae brief to Judge Marra stating in her own words that the protections Mr. Epstein thought he bargained for in the NPA were "illusory", and indicating that the federal gove

overnment could always find a way to indict Mr. Epstein even well after he completed the sentence required of him under the NPA. See United States' Response to Court's Order Requesting Position on Defendant's Motion to Stay, fn. 5, pp. 14-15. Moreover, Ms. Villafana served written notice on Mr. Epstein's counsel t

NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the E

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

#1 and #21 United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to yo

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The -Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

NE 4th Street Miami, Florida 33132 Privileged Communication Re: Litigation Hold re: Jane Does #1 and #21. United States, Case No.: 08-80736-C1V- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the E

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe NI and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

and #2 v. United States, Case No.: 08.80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein As a follow-up to yo

was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA 's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at ¶¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was] an orchestrated decision [between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein] to d

#1 and #2I United States, Case No.: 08-80736-CIV- MARRA/Johnson AND Jeffrey Epstein Dear Rolando: I wri

1 was not consulted with respect to the USAO-SDFLA's negotiations with Epstein (DE 1 at 1¶3-6). The "Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe # 2 Status Report and Response to Court's Order to Show Lack of Prosecution" (DE 41) argues that "there [was) an orchestrated decision (between the "U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein) to d