3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
4 / 3
Mentions
counsel, the settlement conference to be convened in this matter. The right to participate in the settlement conference flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene as of right at the remedy stage of these proceedings to advocate for why the remedy in this case—to
the settlement conference flows inexorably from Judge Marra's granting of Mr. Epstein's motion to intervene
ed the propriety of intervention to litigate remedy. See, e.g., Benjamin ex rel. Yock v. Department of Public Welfare, 701 F.3d 938 (3d Cir. 2012); Howard v. McLucas, 782 F.2d 956, 959-61 (1 I th Cir. 1986); National Resources Defense Council v. Costle, 561 F.2d 904, 907-08 (D.C.Cir. 1977); see also Catmint) v. B
UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs
zed the propriety of intervention to litigate remedy. See, e.g., Benjamin ex reL Yock v. Department of Public Welfare, 701 F.3d 938 (3d Cir. 2012); Howard v. McLucas, 782 F.2d 956, 959-61 (11th Cir. 1986); Costle, 561 F.2d at 907-08; see also Caterino v. Berry, 922 F.2d 37 (1st Cir. 1990) (district court denied i
UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Plaintiffs
ized the propriety of intervention to litigate remedy. See, e.g., Benjamin a reL Yock v. Department of Public Welfare, 701 F.3d 938 (3d Cir. 2012); Howard v. McLucas, 782 F.2d 956, 959-61 (11th Cir. 1986); Costle, 561 F.2d at 907-08; see also Caterino v. Berry, 922 F.2d 37 (1st Cir. 1990)(district court denied in
Entities connected to both Kenneth Marra and Howard v. McLucas

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
United States
LOCATIONLeon Black
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONRoy Black
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Harvey Weinstein
PERSONNadia Marcinkova
PERSON
Samantha Power
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSONSantobello
PERSON
Thomas Jefferson
PERSONCastaneda
PERSONIntervenors
ORGANIZATIONAl-Arian
PERSONChiles v. Thornburgh
PERSONResponse to Government's
ORGANIZATION